Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597890›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

NetMe 2.0: a web-based platform for extracting and modeling knowledge from biomedical literature as a labeled graph.

Antonio Di Maria, Lorenzo Bellomo, Fabrizio Billeci, Alfio Cardillo, Salvatore Alaimo, Paolo Ferragina, Alfredo Ferro, Alfredo Pulvirenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Di MariaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Lorenzo BellomoScuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 56126 , Italy.
Fabrizio BilleciDepartment of Computer Science, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Alfio CardilloDepartment of Computer Science, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Salvatore AlaimoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Paolo FerraginaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, 56126 , Italy.
Alfredo FerroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Alfredo PulvirentiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9764-0295

Funding

European Integrated Infrastructure for Social Mining and Big Data AnalyticsNextGenerationEU-National Recovery and Resilience Plan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe rapid increase of bio-medical literature makes it harder and harder for scientists to keep pace with the discoveries on which they build their studies. Therefore, computational tools have become more widespread, among which network analysis plays a crucial role in several life-science contexts. Nevertheless, building correct and complete networks about some user-defined biomedical topics on top of the available literature is still challenging.

resultsWe introduce NetMe 2.0, a web-based platform that automatically extracts relevant biomedical entities and their relations from a set of input texts-i.e. in the form of full-text or abstract of PubMed Central's papers, free texts, or PDFs uploaded by users-and models them as a BioMedical Knowledge Graph (BKG). NetMe 2.0 also implements an innovative Retrieval Augmented Generation module (Graph-RAG) that works on top of the relationships modeled by the BKG and allows the distilling of well-formed sentences that explain their content. The experimental results show that NetMe 2.0 can infer comprehensive and reliable biological networks with significant Precision-Recall metrics when compared to state-of-the-art approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://netme.click/.

Indexed as

InternetComputational BiologyData MiningPubMedSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38597890
PMCPMC11074003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.