Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597875›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Deep learning enables automatic detection of joint damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis-model development and external validation.

Mikko S Venäläinen, Alexander Biehl, Milja Holstila, Laura Kuusalo, Laura L Elo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikko S VenäläinenTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1777-4259
Alexander BiehlTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Milja HolstilaDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7080-3763
Laura KuusaloCentre for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-8439
Laura L EloTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 310561Academy of Finland 322123Biocenter FinlandELIXIR FinlandEuropean Research Council 677943European Union's Horizon 2020 955321Sigrid Juselius FoundationUniversity of Turku Graduate School
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough deep learning has demonstrated substantial potential in automatic quantification of joint damage in RA, evidence for detecting longitudinal changes at an individual patient level is lacking. Here, we introduce and externally validate our automated RA scoring algorithm (AuRA), and demonstrate its utility for monitoring radiographic progression in a real-world setting.

methodsThe algorithm, originally developed during the Rheumatoid Arthritis 2-Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods (RA2-DREAM) challenge, was trained to predict expert-curated Sharp-van der Heijde total scores in hand and foot radiographs from two previous clinical studies (n = 367). We externally validated AuRA against data (n = 205) from Turku University Hospital and compared the performance against two top-performing RA2-DREAM solutions. Finally, for 54 patients, we extracted additional radiograph sets from another control visit to the clinic (average time interval of 4.6 years).

resultsIn the external validation cohort, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 23.6, AuRA outperformed both top-performing RA2-DREAM algorithms (RMSEs 35.0 and 35.6). The improved performance was explained mostly by lower errors at higher expert-assessed scores. The longitudinal changes predicted by our algorithm were significantly correlated with changes in expert-assessed scores (Pearson's R = 0.74, P < 0.001).

conclusionAuRA had the best external validation performance and demonstrated potential for detecting longitudinal changes in joint damage. Available from https://hub.docker.com/r/elolab/aura, our algorithm can easily be applied for automatic detection of radiographic progression in the future, reducing the need for laborious manual scoring.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidDeep LearningHand JointsAdultAgedAlgorithmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFoot JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographySeverity of Illness Indexdeep learningdisease progressionradiographic joint damageradiographic scoringrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID38597875
PMCPMC11879318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.