Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597781›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2024

Sediment Toxicity Tests: A Critical Review of Their use in Environmental Regulations.

Matti T Leppanen, Sandrine Sourisseau, Robert M Burgess, Stuart L Simpson, Paul Sibley, Michiel T O Jonker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Matti T LeppanenFinnish Environment Institute, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5122-0324
Sandrine SourisseauToxicology Department, TotalEnergies, Paris La Défense, France.
Robert M BurgessAtlantic Coastal Environmental Science Division, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-5125
Stuart L SimpsonCSIRO Environment, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Paul SibleySchool of Environmental Sciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Michiel T O JonkerInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2649-4443
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUEnvironmental Protection Agency · USFinnish Environment Institute · FITotal (France) · FRUniversity of Guelph · CAUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sediments are an integral component of aquatic systems, linking multiple water uses, functions, and services. Contamination of sediments by chemicals is a worldwide problem, with many jurisdictions trying to prevent future pollution (prospective) and manage existing contamination (retrospective). The present review assesses the implementation of sediment toxicity testing in environmental regulations globally. Currently, the incorporation of sediment toxicity testing in regulations is most common in the European Union (EU), North America, and Australasian regions, with some expansion in Asia and non-EU Europe. Employing sediment toxicity testing in prospective assessments (i.e., before chemicals are allowed on the market) is most advanced and harmonized with pesticides. In the retrospective assessment of environmental risks (i.e., chemicals already contaminating sediments), regulatory sediment toxicity testing practices are applied inconsistently on the global scale. International harmonization of sediment toxicity tests is considered an asset and has been successful through the widespread adoption and deployment of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines. On the other hand, retrospective sediment assessments benefit from incorporating regional species and protocols. Currently used toxicity testing species are diverse, with temperate species being applied most often, whereas test protocols are insufficiently flexible to appropriately address the range of environmental contaminants, including nanomaterials, highly hydrophobic contaminants, and ionized chemicals. The ever-increasing and -changing pressures placed on aquatic resources are a challenge for protection and management efforts, calling for continuous sediment toxicity test method improvement to insure effective use in regulatory frameworks. Future developments should focus on including more subtle and specific toxicity endpoints (e.g., incorporating bioavailability-based in vitro tests) and genomic techniques, extending sediment toxicity testing from single to multispecies approaches, and providing a better link with ecological protection goals. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1697-1716. © 2024 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsToxicity TestsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PolicyWater Pollutants, ChemicalClean Water ActDredgingEnvironmental regulationsProspectiveREACHRetrospectiveSediment toxicity testingSuperfund

Identifiers

PMID38597781
PMCPMC11326746
OpenAlexW4394683139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.