Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Nicotine Salt and Free-Base Using an E-cigarette: A Randomized Crossover Study.
Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicant Exposures After Switching From Cigarettes to a Pod-Based Electronic Cigarette: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Standardized research electronic cigarette acceptability among adult men and women who smoke combustible cigarettes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025Trial
- Acute effects of electronic nicotine delivery system liquid nicotine form and sweet enhancer among people who use inhaled tobacco products.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Effects of E-Liquid Formulations on Nicotine Vapor Pressure and Implications for Nicotine Delivery and Toxicity.Toxics · 2026Article
- Article
- Changes in the use of e-cigarettes to stop smoking among adults following the rise of disposable vapes: a repeat cross-sectional survey 2016-2023 in England.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- E-cigarettes and cardiovascular health: a review of components, mechanisms, and clinical risk.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Review
- Article
- Trends in Daily Nicotine Vaping and Unsuccessful Quit Attempts in Youths.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Implications for the Clinician.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Review
- Vaping cessation strategies and triggers for relapse amongst people from New Zealand who have vaped.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
- Nicotine Exposure From Smoking Tobacco and Vaping Among Adolescents.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- The Smoky Impact of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Testicular Function.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Measures of youth e-cigarette use: strengths, weaknesses and recommendations.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPopular "pod-style" e-cigarettes commonly use nicotine salt-based e-liquids that cause less irritation when inhaled and can deliver higher nicotine concentrations than free-base nicotine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of different nicotine formulations (salt vs. free-base) and concentrations that might influence systemic nicotine absorption and appeal of e-cigarettes. AIMS AND
methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, within-subject crossover study, 20 non-nicotine-naïve participants were switched among three e-liquids (free-base nicotine 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 40 mg/mL) using a refillable pod system and a standardized vaping protocol (one puff every 30 seconds, 10 puffs total). Serum nicotine concentrations and vital signs were assessed over 180 minutes; direct effects, craving, satisfaction, withdrawal, and respiratory symptoms were measured using questionnaires. CYP2A6 genotypes and the nicotine metabolite ratio were also assessed.
resultsEleven (55%) participants were male and the median age was 23.5 years (range 18-67). All three formulations differed significantly in peak serum nicotine concentration (baseline adjusted Cmax, median (range): 12.0 ng/mL (1.6-27.3), 5.4 ng/mL (1.9-18.7), and 3.0 ng/mL (1.3-8.8) for nicotine salt 40 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL and free-base 20 mg/mL, respectively). All groups reached Cmax 2.0-2.5 minutes (median) after their last puff. Differences in subjective effects were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were observed.
conclusionsFree-base 20 mg/mL formulations achieved lower blood nicotine concentrations than nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, while 40 mg/mL nicotine salt yielded concentrations similar to cigarette smoking. The findings can inform regulatory policy regarding e-liquids and their potential use in smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: Nicotine salt formulations inhaled by an e-cigarette led to higher nicotine delivery compared to nicotine-free-base formulations with the same nicotine concentration. These findings should be considered in future regulatory discussions. The 40 mg/mL nicotine salt formulation showed similar nicotine delivery as combustible cigarettes, albeit at concentrations over the maximum limit for e-liquids allowed in the European Union. Nicotine delivery resembling combustible cigarettes might be beneficial for smokers willing to quit to adequately alleviate withdrawal symptoms. However, increased nicotine delivery can also pose a public health risk, raising concerns about abuse liability, especially among youth and nonsmokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.