Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597729›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Nicotine Salt and Free-Base Using an E-cigarette: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Samuel E Christen, Laura Hermann, Elias Bekka, Celina Vonwyl, Felix Hammann, Vera van der Velpen, Chin B Eap, Neal L Benowitz, Manuel Haschke, Evangelia Liakoni

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Standardized research electronic cigarette acceptability among adult men and women who smoke combustible cigarettes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel E ChristenClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-3103-781X
Laura HermannClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Elias BekkaClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9958-7769
Celina VonwylClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Felix HammannClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-9330
Vera van der VelpenClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-7197
Chin B EapUnit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-0230
Neal L BenowitzDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-8124
Manuel HaschkeClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1846-8640
Evangelia LiakoniClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-1378

Funding

Department of Teaching and ResearchInsel Gruppe AGUniversity Hospital Bern
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPopular "pod-style" e-cigarettes commonly use nicotine salt-based e-liquids that cause less irritation when inhaled and can deliver higher nicotine concentrations than free-base nicotine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of different nicotine formulations (salt vs. free-base) and concentrations that might influence systemic nicotine absorption and appeal of e-cigarettes. AIMS AND

methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, within-subject crossover study, 20 non-nicotine-naïve participants were switched among three e-liquids (free-base nicotine 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 40 mg/mL) using a refillable pod system and a standardized vaping protocol (one puff every 30 seconds, 10 puffs total). Serum nicotine concentrations and vital signs were assessed over 180 minutes; direct effects, craving, satisfaction, withdrawal, and respiratory symptoms were measured using questionnaires. CYP2A6 genotypes and the nicotine metabolite ratio were also assessed.

resultsEleven (55%) participants were male and the median age was 23.5 years (range 18-67). All three formulations differed significantly in peak serum nicotine concentration (baseline adjusted Cmax, median (range): 12.0 ng/mL (1.6-27.3), 5.4 ng/mL (1.9-18.7), and 3.0 ng/mL (1.3-8.8) for nicotine salt 40 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL and free-base 20 mg/mL, respectively). All groups reached Cmax 2.0-2.5 minutes (median) after their last puff. Differences in subjective effects were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were observed.

conclusionsFree-base 20 mg/mL formulations achieved lower blood nicotine concentrations than nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, while 40 mg/mL nicotine salt yielded concentrations similar to cigarette smoking. The findings can inform regulatory policy regarding e-liquids and their potential use in smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: Nicotine salt formulations inhaled by an e-cigarette led to higher nicotine delivery compared to nicotine-free-base formulations with the same nicotine concentration. These findings should be considered in future regulatory discussions. The 40 mg/mL nicotine salt formulation showed similar nicotine delivery as combustible cigarettes, albeit at concentrations over the maximum limit for e-liquids allowed in the European Union. Nicotine delivery resembling combustible cigarettes might be beneficial for smokers willing to quit to adequately alleviate withdrawal symptoms. However, increased nicotine delivery can also pose a public health risk, raising concerns about abuse liability, especially among youth and nonsmokers.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineVapingAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAgedCytochrome P-450 CYP2A6Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCYP2A6 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2A6Nicotine

Identifiers

PMID38597729
PMCPMC11417154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.