ReviewAnalytical chemistry2024
Maximizing Electrochemical Information: A Perspective on Background-Inclusive Fast Voltammetry.
Review in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Multimodal Neural Probe with Integrated Three-Electrode Aptameric Sensing for In Vivo Monitoring of Dopamine Dynamics and Neural Activity.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Neurotransmitter Monitoring by Fast Voltammetry: Current and Future Prospects.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Recent advances of in situ and in vivo electrochemical analysis of brain chemistry at micro- and nanoscale.QRB discovery · 2026Review
- A thermo-electrochemical cell with a threaded graphite electrode towards low-grade heat recovery.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Biological and Mechanical Limitations for Chronic Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry Sensor Design.Advanced materials technologies · 2025Article
- Review
- SeroWare: An Open-Source Software Suite for Voltammetry Data Acquisition and Analysis.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This perspective encompasses a focused review of the literature leading to a tipping point in electroanalytical chemistry. We tie together the threads of a "revolution" quietly in the making for years through the work of many authors. Long-held misconceptions about the use of background subtraction in fast voltammetry are addressed. We lay out future advantages that accompany background-inclusive voltammetry, particularly when paired with modern machine-learning algorithms for data analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.