Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597163›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2024

Physiological, body composition, and body mass measures show that a developmental measure of weight suppression is more valid than the traditional measure.

Michael R Lowe, Simar Singh, Michael Rosenbaum, Laurel Mayer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R LoweDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6301-9214
Simar SinghDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3170-2924
Michael RosenbaumDepartment of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-9202
Laurel MayerDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-1133
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USDrexel University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

CLINICAL SERVICES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH018261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Kaja Zabrina LeWinn, Rachel L. Loewy · 1985 to 2026
$7.0M
Weight Suppression, Dieting and Bulimia Nervosa: A Biobehavioral StudyR01MH095982 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LOWE, MICHAEL R · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS MH095982NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095982NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018261NIMH NIH HHS T32MH018261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe traditional measure of weight suppression (TWS; the difference between an individual's highest past weight at adult height and current weight), has been associated with many psychological, behavioral and biological variables in those with eating disorders. A new measure of weight suppression, called developmental weight suppression (DWS), corrects two major problems in the original measure. Initial research indicates that DWS represents a superior operationalization of the construct weight suppression was originally designed to measure (Lowe [1993, Psychol Bull, 114: 100]). This study is the first to examine the relation between both WS measures and weight history, body composition and a variety of metabolic hormones.

methodsData were collected in 91 women with bulimia nervosa (BN) or BN-spectrum disorders.

resultsBoth weight suppression indices were related to multiple hormones. However, multiple regression analyses showed that the independent effects of DWS differed from the independent effects of TWS in that only DWS was negatively related to: (1) current z-BMI, (2) body fat percentage, and (3) insulin, leptin, T3 free, and TSH. This differential pattern also occurred when results were corrected for multiple comparisons. DISCUSSION: Findings provide stronger biological support for the construct validity of DWS than TWS and suggest that: (1) from the perspective of individuals with BN, high DWS embodies success at food restriction and weight loss, (2) elevated DWS may trap individuals with BN in a powerful biobehavioral bind, and (3) DWS is the preferred measure of weight suppression in future research on eating disorders. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Most individuals with bulimia nervosa lose substantial weight in the process of developing their disorder. Such weight suppression is related to many characteristics of those with the eating disorder bulimia nervosa. This study shows why a new measure of weight suppression, based on an individual's growth during development, is more biologically valid than the traditional measure of weight suppression.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBody Mass IndexAdolescentAdultBody WeightBulimia NervosaFemaleHumansWeight LossYoung Adultbody compositionbulimia nervosadevelopmental weight suppressionmetabolic hormonesweight lossweight suppression

Identifiers

PMID38597163
PMCPMC11949195
OpenAlexW4394691740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.