Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38597012›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2022

Comparison of surgical effects between the modified West China method and Millard method in repairing unila-teral cleft lip.

Xiaolin Liu, Yu Wang, Xiaowei Feng, Wenjing Liu, Xiangjun Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaolin LiuDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
Yu WangDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
Xiaowei FengDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
Wenjing LiuDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
Xiangjun LiDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare the surgical effects of the modified West China method and Millard methods for repairing unilateral cleft lip.

methodsA total of 34 cases of unilateral cleft lip were analyzed, composed of 16 cases in the experimental group subjected to the modified West China method and 18 cases in the control group, which was subjected to the Millard method. Photographs before and after operation were compared, and SPSS 21.0 was used in statistical analysis.

resultsAfter operation, no significant difference in symmetry between the healthy and affected sides of the nasal alar foot (sba), nasal alar point (al), lip peak point (cph), and mouth angle point (ch) in the experimental group (

conclusionsFor unilateral cleft lip repair, two methods had better effects on lip repair, but the nasal symmetry showed greater improvement when the modified West China me-thod was used than when the Millard method was used.

Indexed as

modified West China methodsurgical effectunilateral cleft lip

Identifiers

PMID38597012
PMCPMC9207799
OpenAlexW4394750796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.