ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2022
Evaluation of root-canal isthmus debridement efficacy of 3 kinds of activated irrigation technique.
Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical Variations in Root Canal Configuration of Maxillary Second Premolars: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- The effect of different activation irrigations on intracanal smear layer removal: a vitro study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of three auxiliary irrigation methods for cleaning the internal walls of root canals of curved isolated teeth.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the capabilities of sonic, ultrasonic, and laser-activated irrigation for debris removal in the root canal isthmus.
methodsA total of 32 human maxillary first premolars with root canal isthmus were prepared by Reciproc Blue, and were randomly divided into four groups (
resultsThe isthmus debridement efficacy of conventional syringe irrigation, sonic, ultrasonic, and laser groups after 80 s irrigation were 30.91%±3.14%, 52.22%±0.31%, 83.77%±5.64%, and 77.97%±7.97%, respectively. The isthmus debridement efficacy of the three experimental groups were better than the conventional syringe irrigation group (
conclusionsUltrasonic, sonic, and laser-activated irrigation have better results in removing debris from the isthmus than conventional syringe irrigation. The isthmus debridement efficacy of sonic- and laser-activated irrigation are slightly better than that of ultrasonic activated irrigation. The debridement efficacies of 120 s irrigation are better than those of 80 s irrigaion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.