Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596915›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2024

Changes in Residency Applicant Cancellation Patterns with Virtual Interviews: A Single-site Analysis.

Meryll Bouldin, Carly Eastin, Rachael Freeze-Ramsey, Amanda Young, Meredith von Dohlen, Lauren Evans, Travis Eastin, Sarah Greenberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meryll BouldinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Carly EastinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Rachael Freeze-RamseyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Amanda YoungUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Meredith von DohlenUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Lauren EvansUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Travis EastinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sarah GreenbergerUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Cardiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residency programs transitioned to primarily virtual interviews due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This shift raised questions regarding expectations and patterns of applicant cancellation timeliness. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in applicant cancellations after transitioning to virtual interviews. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of interview data from a three-year emergency medicine residency at a tertiary-care academic medical center. Using archived data from Interview Broker, we examined scheduling patterns between one in-person (2019-2020) and two virtual interview cohorts (2020-2021 and 2021-2022). Our outcomes were the overall cancellation rates relative to interview slots as well as the proportion of cancellations that occurred within 7 or 14 days of the interview date. Results: There were 453 interview slots and 568 applicants invited. Overall, applicants canceled 17.1% of scheduled interviews. Compared with in-person interviews, applicants canceled significantly fewer virtual interviews (in person: 40/128 (31.3%), virtual year 1: 22/178 (12.4%), virtual year 2: 15/143 (10.5%), Conclusion: While limited, at our site, changing to a virtual interview format correlated with fewer cancellations overall. The proportion of cancellations within 14 days was much higher during virtual interview seasons, with most cancellations occurring during that time frame. Additional studies are needed to determine the effects of cancellation patterns on emergency medicine recruitment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internship and ResidencyAcademic Medical CentersHumansPandemicsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38596915
PMCPMC11000553
OpenAlexW4392819064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.