Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596848›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Scalable Approach to Consumer Wearable Postmarket Surveillance: Development and Validation Study.

Richard M Yoo, Ben T Viggiano, Krishna N Pundi, Jason A Fries, Aydin Zahedivash, Tanya Podchiyska, Natasha Din, Nigam H Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard M Yoo *Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1349-8237
Ben T Viggiano *Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-7567
Krishna N PundiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-367X
Jason A FriesDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-5768
Aydin ZahedivashDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-1139
Tanya PodchiyskaVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9945-3629
Natasha DinVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5312-4451
Nigam H ShahDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-7158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the capability to render prediagnoses, consumer wearables have the potential to affect subsequent diagnoses and the level of care in the health care delivery setting. Despite this, postmarket surveillance of consumer wearables has been hindered by the lack of codified terms in electronic health records (EHRs) to capture wearable use. Objective: We sought to develop a weak supervision-based approach to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of EHR-based postmarket surveillance on consumer wearables that render atrial fibrillation (AF) prediagnoses. Methods: We applied data programming, where labeling heuristics are expressed as code-based labeling functions, to detect incidents of AF prediagnoses. A labeler model was then derived from the predictions of the labeling functions using the Snorkel framework. The labeler model was applied to clinical notes to probabilistically label them, and the labeled notes were then used as a training set to fine-tune a classifier called Clinical-Longformer. The resulting classifier identified patients with an AF prediagnosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, where the baseline characteristics and subsequent care patterns of patients identified by the classifier were compared against those who did not receive a prediagnosis. Results: The labeler model derived from the labeling functions showed high accuracy (0.92; F1-score=0.77) on the training set. The classifier trained on the probabilistically labeled notes accurately identified patients with an AF prediagnosis (0.95; F1-score=0.83). The cohort study conducted using the constructed system carried enough statistical power to verify the key findings of the Apple Heart Study, which enrolled a much larger number of participants, where patients who received a prediagnosis tended to be older, male, and White with higher CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) scores (P<.001). We also made a novel discovery that patients with a prediagnosis were more likely to use anticoagulants (525/1037, 50.63% vs 5936/16,560, 35.85%) and have an eventual AF diagnosis (305/1037, 29.41% vs 262/16,560, 1.58%). At the index diagnosis, the existence of a prediagnosis did not distinguish patients based on clinical characteristics, but did correlate with anticoagulant prescription (P=.004 for apixaban and P=.01 for rivaroxaban). Conclusions: Our work establishes the feasibility and efficacy of an EHR-based surveillance system for consumer wearables that render AF prediagnoses. Further work is necessary to generalize these findings for patient populations at other sites.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaartificial intelligenceatrial fibrillationcardiologyclassifierconsumerconsumersconsumer wearable devicesdevicedevicesdiagnosediagnosisEHRelectronic health recordelectronic health recordsevaluationheartlabelerlabelingmachine learningmonitoringnatural language processingNLPpostmarket surveillancesurveillancewearablewearables

Identifiers

PMID38596848
PMCPMC11024395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.