Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596779›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024

GPT-4 Performance for Neurologic Localization.

Jung-Hyun Lee, Eunhee Choi, Robert McDougal, William W Lytton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Large Language Models in Neurological Practice: Real-World Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  8. Prompt Engineering in Clinical Practice: Tutorial for Clinicians.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Large language models for neurology: a mini review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jung-Hyun LeeDepartment of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University; Department of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), Kings County Hospital; Department of Neurology (J-HL), Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn; Department of Internal Medicine (EC), Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Department of Biostatistics (RM), Yale School of Public Health; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (RM); Wu-Tsai Institute (RM); Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (RM), Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7751-792X
Eunhee ChoiDepartment of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University; Department of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), Kings County Hospital; Department of Neurology (J-HL), Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn; Department of Internal Medicine (EC), Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Department of Biostatistics (RM), Yale School of Public Health; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (RM); Wu-Tsai Institute (RM); Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (RM), Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9945-1322
Robert McDougalDepartment of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University; Department of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), Kings County Hospital; Department of Neurology (J-HL), Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn; Department of Internal Medicine (EC), Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Department of Biostatistics (RM), Yale School of Public Health; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (RM); Wu-Tsai Institute (RM); Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (RM), Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-3127
William W LyttonDepartment of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University; Department of Neurology (J-HL, WWL), Kings County Hospital; Department of Neurology (J-HL), Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn; Department of Internal Medicine (EC), Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Department of Biostatistics (RM), Yale School of Public Health; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (RM); Wu-Tsai Institute (RM); Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (RM), Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (WWL), State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-2849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In health care, large language models such as Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPTs), trained on extensive text datasets, have potential applications in reducing health care disparities across regions and populations. Previous software developed for lesion localization has been limited in scope. This study aims to evaluate the capability of GPT-4 for lesion localization based on clinical presentation. Methods: GPT-4 was prompted using history and neurologic physical examination (H&P) from published cases of acute stroke followed by questions for clinical reasoning with answering for "single or multiple lesions," "side," and "brain region" using Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought and Text Classification prompting. GPT-4 output on 3 separate trials for each of 46 cases was compared with imaging-based localization. Results: GPT-4 successfully processed raw text from H&P to generate accurate neuroanatomical localization and detailed clinical reasoning. Performance metrics across trial-based analysis for specificity, sensitivity, precision, and F1-score were 0.87, 0.74, 0.75, and 0.74, respectively, for side; 0.94, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively, for brain region. Class labels within the brain region were similarly high for all regions except the cerebellum and were also similar when considering all 3 trials to examine metrics by case. Errors were due to extrinsic causes-inadequate information in the published cases, and intrinsic causes-failures of logic or inadequate knowledge base. Discussion: This study reveals capabilities of GPT-4 in the localization of acute stroke lesions, showing a potential future role as a clinical tool in neurology.

Identifiers

PMID38596779
PMCPMC11003355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.