ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
GPT-4 Performance for Neurologic Localization.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Education Research: Validation of an AI-Powered Educational Platform for Neuroanatomical Localization and Stroke Syndrome Recognition: A Multicenter Study.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- ChatGPT in the diagnosis and management of complex polyneuropathies: comparative analysis with neurologists using real-world cases.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Article
- Large Language Models in Clinical Neurology: A Systematic Review.Research square · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Neurological Practice: Real-World Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Prompt Engineering in Clinical Practice: Tutorial for Clinicians.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Current Landscape and Future Directions Regarding Generative Large Language Models in Stroke Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Large language models for neurology: a mini review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Qualitative metrics from the biomedical literature for evaluating large language models in clinical decision-making: a narrative review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
- Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Neurology, Using Neurologic Localization as an Example.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- Neurological history both twinned and queried by generative artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In health care, large language models such as Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPTs), trained on extensive text datasets, have potential applications in reducing health care disparities across regions and populations. Previous software developed for lesion localization has been limited in scope. This study aims to evaluate the capability of GPT-4 for lesion localization based on clinical presentation. Methods: GPT-4 was prompted using history and neurologic physical examination (H&P) from published cases of acute stroke followed by questions for clinical reasoning with answering for "single or multiple lesions," "side," and "brain region" using Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought and Text Classification prompting. GPT-4 output on 3 separate trials for each of 46 cases was compared with imaging-based localization. Results: GPT-4 successfully processed raw text from H&P to generate accurate neuroanatomical localization and detailed clinical reasoning. Performance metrics across trial-based analysis for specificity, sensitivity, precision, and F1-score were 0.87, 0.74, 0.75, and 0.74, respectively, for side; 0.94, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively, for brain region. Class labels within the brain region were similarly high for all regions except the cerebellum and were also similar when considering all 3 trials to examine metrics by case. Errors were due to extrinsic causes-inadequate information in the published cases, and intrinsic causes-failures of logic or inadequate knowledge base. Discussion: This study reveals capabilities of GPT-4 in the localization of acute stroke lesions, showing a potential future role as a clinical tool in neurology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.