Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596736›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2024

Neural network analysis of neutron and X-ray reflectivity data incorporating prior knowledge.

Valentin Munteanu, Vladimir Starostin, Alessandro Greco, Linus Pithan, Alexander Gerlach, Alexander Hinderhofer, Stefan Kowarik, Frank Schreiber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valentin MunteanuUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-3863
Vladimir StarostinUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-6256
Alessandro GrecoUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-7941
Linus PithanUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-3273
Alexander GerlachUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-1868
Alexander HinderhoferUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-6386
Stefan KowarikDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstraße 28, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7661-1949
Frank SchreiberUniversity of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-6718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the ambiguity related to the lack of phase information, determining the physical parameters of multilayer thin films from measured neutron and X-ray reflectivity curves is, on a fundamental level, an underdetermined inverse problem. This ambiguity poses limitations on standard neural networks, constraining the range and number of considered parameters in previous machine learning solutions. To overcome this challenge, a novel training procedure has been designed which incorporates dynamic prior boundaries for each physical parameter as additional inputs to the neural network. In this manner, the neural network can be trained simultaneously on all well-posed subintervals of a larger parameter space in which the inverse problem is underdetermined. During inference, users can flexibly input their own prior knowledge about the physical system to constrain the neural network prediction to distinct target subintervals in the parameter space. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated in various scenarios, including multilayer structures with a box model parameterization and a physics-inspired special parameterization of the scattering length density profile for a multilayer structure. In contrast to previous methods, this approach scales favourably when increasing the complexity of the inverse problem, working properly even for a five-layer multilayer model and a periodic multilayer model with up to 17 open parameters.

Indexed as

inverse problemsmachine learningreflectometrysoft matter

Identifiers

PMID38596736
PMCPMC11001411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.