ArticleOxford open neuroscience2022
Dampened sensory representations for expected input across the ventral visual stream.
Article in Oxford open neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Faster but less precise: expectation enhances response speed while reducing sensory fidelity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- What is next? Predictable visual sequences are encoded with anticipatory biases and reduced neural responses.iScience · 2026Article
- Higher-level spatial prediction in natural vision across mouse visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Sensory sharpening and semantic prediction errors unify competing models of predictive processing in human speech comprehension.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Sensory Representation of Neural Networks Using Sound and Color for Medical Imaging Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Limited Evidence for Probabilistic Cueing Effects on Grating-Evoked Event-Related Potentials and Orientation Decoding Performance.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Violated predictions enhance the representational fidelity of visual features in perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- High-level visual prediction errors in early visual cortex.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Predictions enable top-down pattern separation in the macaque face-processing hierarchy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Conceptual Associations Generate Sensory Predictions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expectations, derived from previous experience, can help in making perception faster, more reliable and informative. A key neural signature of perceptual expectations is expectation suppression, an attenuated neural response to expected compared with unexpected stimuli. While expectation suppression has been reported using a variety of paradigms and recording methods, it remains unclear what neural modulation underlies this response attenuation. Sharpening models propose that neural populations tuned away from an expected stimulus are particularly suppressed by expectations, thereby resulting in an attenuated, but sharper population response. In contrast, dampening models suggest that neural populations tuned toward the expected stimulus are most suppressed, thus resulting in a dampened, less redundant population response. Empirical support is divided, with some studies favoring sharpening, while others support dampening. A key limitation of previous neuroimaging studies is the ability to draw inferences about neural-level modulations based on population (e.g. voxel) level signals. Indeed, recent simulations of repetition suppression showed that opposite neural modulations can lead to comparable population-level modulations. Forward models provide one solution to this inference limitation. Here, we used forward models to implement sharpening and dampening models, mapping neural modulations to voxel-level data. We show that a feature-specific gain modulation, suppressing neurons tuned toward the expected stimulus, best explains the empirical fMRI data. Thus, our results support the dampening account of expectation suppression, suggesting that expectations reduce redundancy in sensory cortex, and thereby promote updating of internal models on the basis of surprising information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.