Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596698›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Patient factors associated with telehealth quality and experience among adults with chronic conditions.

Esther Yoon, Scott Hur, Laura M Curtis, Julia Yoshino Benavente, Michael S Wolf, Marina Serper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Barriers and Facilitators to Telehealth in Underserved Rural Communities: A Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esther YoonDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-485X
Scott HurDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Laura M CurtisDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Julia Yoshino BenaventeDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Michael S WolfDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Marina SerperDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

Supplement to LitCog III: Health Literacy and Cognitive Function among Older AdultsR01AG030611 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOLF, MICHAEL S · 2007 to 2024
$11.6M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030611NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patient-reported experiences of telehealth and disparities in access, use, and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: We examined data from the fifth wave of the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) study conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. Results: Of the 718 participants, 342 (47.6%) reported having a telehealth visit within the past 4 months. Participants who had a recent telehealth visit were younger, reported worse overall health and chronic illness burden, and living below poverty level. Among participants who had a telehealth visit, 66.7% reported telephone visits and most participants (57.6%) rated telehealth quality as better-or-equal-to in-person visits. Inadequate health literacy was associated with lower likelihood of reporting telehealth quality and usefulness. In multivariable analyses, lower patient activation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.19, 95% CI, 0.05-0.59) and limited English proficiency (AOR 0.12, 95% CI, 0.03-0.47) were less likely to report telehealth as being better than in-person visits; lower patient activation (AOR 0.06, 95% CI, 0.003-0.41) and income below poverty level (AOR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.13-0.98) were associated with difficulty remembering telehealth visit information. Discussion: Most participants reported usefulness and ease of navigating telehealth. Lower socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, inadequate health literacy, lower educational attainment, and low patient activation are risks for poorer quality telehealth. Conclusion: The COVID pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth, however, disparities in access and self-reported visit quality persist. Since telemedicine is here to stay, we identify vulnerable populations and discuss potential solutions to reduce healthcare disparities in telehealth use.

Indexed as

healthcare disparitiesquality of health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38596698
PMCPMC11000823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.