ArticleJAMIA open2024
Patient factors associated with telehealth quality and experience among adults with chronic conditions.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Satisfaction Resilience in Virtual Home Health Care for Chronic Disease Management: Lifestyle-Integration Motivation and Functional Equivalence Beliefs in a Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Telehealth in Underserved Rural Communities: A Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Cultural adaptation of Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends (ENABLE) for patients with heart failure and their caregivers in South-East Asia - a qualitative formative evaluation study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Reporting of Telehealth Implementation in Cystic Fibrosis: Scoping Review Using a Novel Theory-Based Evaluation Lens.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Beyond Access: Telehealth Readiness, Trust, and Early Use Among Jordanian Patients with Chronic Illness.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Key Factors Associated With Nonuse of Telemedicine in Patients With Hypertension and/or Diabetes: Findings From the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026Article
- How limited english proficiency impacts patient engagement with telemedicine: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing the adoption of telehealth services for substance use treatment.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Assessment of Telehealth Literacy in Users: Survey and Analysis of Demographic and Behavioral Determinants.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Telehealth satisfaction among patients with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional analysis.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate patient-reported experiences of telehealth and disparities in access, use, and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: We examined data from the fifth wave of the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) study conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. Results: Of the 718 participants, 342 (47.6%) reported having a telehealth visit within the past 4 months. Participants who had a recent telehealth visit were younger, reported worse overall health and chronic illness burden, and living below poverty level. Among participants who had a telehealth visit, 66.7% reported telephone visits and most participants (57.6%) rated telehealth quality as better-or-equal-to in-person visits. Inadequate health literacy was associated with lower likelihood of reporting telehealth quality and usefulness. In multivariable analyses, lower patient activation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.19, 95% CI, 0.05-0.59) and limited English proficiency (AOR 0.12, 95% CI, 0.03-0.47) were less likely to report telehealth as being better than in-person visits; lower patient activation (AOR 0.06, 95% CI, 0.003-0.41) and income below poverty level (AOR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.13-0.98) were associated with difficulty remembering telehealth visit information. Discussion: Most participants reported usefulness and ease of navigating telehealth. Lower socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, inadequate health literacy, lower educational attainment, and low patient activation are risks for poorer quality telehealth. Conclusion: The COVID pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth, however, disparities in access and self-reported visit quality persist. Since telemedicine is here to stay, we identify vulnerable populations and discuss potential solutions to reduce healthcare disparities in telehealth use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.