ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2024
Non‑contact locking plate: A useful alternative to external fixation in second‑stage treatment of post‑traumatic tibial osteomyelitis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of infected tibial bone defects can be challenging for the orthopedic surgeon. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the fixation endurance, bone union time, lower limb joint function and complications associated with different fixation methods in the treatment of bone defects caused by debridement in the treatment of post-traumatic osteomyelitis. The clinical data of 55 patients with infected bone defects of the lower extremities following traumatic injury, who had undergone radical debridement between January 2017 and September 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of fixation during reconstruction, namely the external fixation (EX), internal fixation (IX) and non-contact locking plate (LP) groups. The demographic data, time to bone union, bacterial culture results, complications and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores of the patients were compared among the three groups. The results indicated that the differences in time to bone union and recurrence rates of osteomyelitis among the three groups were not statistically significant. By contrast, functional status after surgery was significantly higher in the LP group compared with the EX group. In total, 8/22 patients (36.4%) in the EX group, 4/13 patients (30.8%) in the IX group and 4/20 patients (20.0%) in the non-contact LP group had shortened limbs and deformed tibia. The SAS assessment results revealed that patients in the non-contact LP group had the lowest rates of moderate and severe anxiety. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate that the non-contact locking plate technique provided stable fixation without any contact between the implant and bone tissues. Therefore, this technique may be viable for use during the reconstruction stage of post-traumatic tibial osteomyelitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.