ArticleCase reports in dermatological medicine2024
Treatment of Subcorneal Pustular Dermatosis without Dapsone: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Case reports in dermatological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by pustules on the trunk and intertriginous areas. While oral dapsone is the first-line treatment for SPD, alternative options are necessary for patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, drug hypersensitivity reactions, or refractory disease. To date, no consensus exists regarding next-best agents for SPD. In this report, we present a patient with significant SPD who developed dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome and then was successfully treated with colchicine and adalimumab. We propose that colchicine should be considered as a second-line treatment for SPD and present a therapeutic algorithm for clinicians to utilize when patients are not candidates for dapsone, have side effects requiring drug discontinuation, or have refractory disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.