ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Free Flap Reconstruction of Sternal Defects after Cardiac Surgery: An Algorithmic Approach for Dealing with Sparse Recipient Vessels.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sparsity of recipient vessels poses a challenge for microsurgical free flap reconstruction of sternal defects following deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery. Methods: From January 2013, a standardized algorithm for dealing with sparse recipient vessels was strictly followed. In this retrospective study including 75 patients, we compared operative details, surgical complications, and reconstructive outcomes of patients treated according to this algorithm (group A: January 2013-May 2021; n = 46) with a historical control group (group B: January 2000-December 2012, n = 29). Results: The left internal mammary artery had been harvested for arterial bypass grafting in 40 of 46 cases (87%) in group A and in all cases in group B. The right internal mammary artery (RIMA) and right internal mammary vein (RIMV) were the first choice as recipient vessels. In case of unsuitability of the RIMV, a right cephalic vein (CV) turndown was used for venous outflow. If both RIMA and RIMV proved insufficient, a single-stage arterio-venous loop (AVL) between the CV and subclavian artery (CV-SA AVL), CV and thoracoacromial artery (CV-TA AVL), or subclavian artery and subclavian vein (SA-SV AVL) was established. The algorithmic approach significantly reduced partial flap necrosis [group A: n = 3 (7%) versus group b: n = 7 (24%); Conclusions: Standardized approaches improve clinical outcomes in microsurgical free flap sternal reconstruction after cardiac surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.