Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596494›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2024

Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route: Who should be screened?

Nobukazu Agatsuma, Takahiro Utsumi, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Takahiro Horimatsu, Takeshi Seta, Yukitaka Yamashita, Yukari Tanaka, Takahiro Inoue, Yuki Nakanishi, Takahiro Shimizu and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Colorectal cancer early screening: Dilemmas and solutions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  4. Colon cancer screening programs prevent cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Early diagnostic strategies for colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Colorectal cancer screening: Modalities and adherence.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  11. Early colorectal cancer screening-no time to lose.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  12. Improving colorectal cancer screening programs.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nobukazu AgatsumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takahiro UtsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Yoshitaka NishikawaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Takahiro HorimatsuInstitute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takeshi SetaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan.
Yukitaka YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan.
Yukari TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Yuki NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takahiro ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Mikako OhnoMedical Support Section, Medical Affairs Division, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Akane FukushimaMedical Support Section, Medical Affairs Division, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Hiroshi SenoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health concern, with advanced-stage diagnoses contributing to poor prognoses. The efficacy of CRC screening has been well-established; nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients remain unscreened, with > 70% of cases diagnosed outside screening. Although identifying specific subgroups for whom CRC screening should be particularly recommended is crucial owing to limited resources, the association between the diagnostic routes and identification of these subgroups has been less appreciated. In the Japanese cancer registry, the diagnostic routes for groups discovered outside of screening are primarily categorized into those with comorbidities found during hospital visits and those with CRC-related symptoms.

aimTo clarify the stage at CRC diagnosis based on diagnostic routes.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using a cancer registry of patients with CRC between January 2016 and December 2019 at two hospitals. The diagnostic routes were primarily classified into three groups: Cancer screening, follow-up, and symptomatic. The early-stage was defined as Stages 0 or I. Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were exploited to determine the odds of early-stage diagnosis in the symptomatic and cancer screening groups, referencing the follow-up group. The adjusted covariates were age, sex, and tumor location.

resultsOf the 2083 patients, 715 (34.4%), 1064 (51.1%), and 304 (14.6%) belonged to the follow-up, symptomatic, and cancer screening groups, respectively. Among the 2083 patients, CRCs diagnosed at an early stage were 57.3% (410 of 715), 23.9% (254 of 1064), and 59.5% (181 of 304) in the follow-up, symptomatic, and cancer screening groups, respectively. The symptomatic group exhibited a lower likelihood of early-stage diagnosis than the follow-up group [

conclusionCRCs detected during hospital visits for comorbidities were diagnosed earlier, similar to cancer screening. CRC screening should be recommended, particularly for patients without periodical hospital visits for comorbidities.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesCancer registryCancer screeningColorectal neoplasmsDiagnostic routeStage at diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38596494
PMCPMC11000077
OpenAlexW4392805934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.