Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596455›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Reirradiation With Proton Therapy for Recurrent Malignancies of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: Results of the Proton Collaborative Group Multi-Institutional Prospective Registry Trial.

Alexandra Hotca, Kunal K Sindhu, Eric J Lehrer, William F Hartsell, Carlos Vargas, Henry K Tsai, John H Chang, Smith Apisarnthanarax, Romaine C Nichols, Arpit M Chhabra and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, reduces chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra HotcaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Kunal K SindhuIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Eric J LehrerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
William F HartsellNorthwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Carlos VargasMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Henry K TsaiProCure New Jersey, Somerset, New Jersey.
John H ChangOklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Smith ApisarnthanaraxUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Proton Therapy, Seattle, Washington.
Romaine C NicholsUniversity of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida.
Arpit M ChhabraIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Shaakir HasanNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
Robert H PressNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
Stanislav LazarevIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Carla HajjNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
Rafi KabarritiNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
William G RuleMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
J Isabelle ChoiNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
New York Proton Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMontefiore Medical Center · USNorthwestern Medicine · USOklahoma Blood Institute · USProCure (United States) · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment options for recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) previously treated with radiation therapy (RT) are limited. Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) can offer lower toxicities by limiting doses to surrounding tissues. In this study, we present the first multi-institutional series reporting on toxicities and outcomes after reRT for locoregionally recurrent EC with PBT. Methods and Materials: Analysis of the prospective, multicenter, Proton Collaborative Group registry of patients with recurrent EC who had previously received photon-based RT and underwent PBT reRT was performed. Patient/tumor characteristics, treatment details, outcomes, and toxicities were collected. Local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Event time was determined from reRT start. Results: Between 2012 and 2020, 31 patients received reRT via uniform scanning/passive scattering (61.3%) or pencil beam scanning (38.7%) PBT at 7 institutions. Median prior RT, PBT reRT, and cumulative doses were 50.4 Gy (range, 37.5-110.4), 48.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (25.2-72.1), and 99.9 Gy (79.1-182.5), respectively. Of these patients, 12.9% had 2 prior RT courses, and 67.7% received PBT with concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 7.2 months (0.9-64.7). Post-PBT, there were 16.7% locoregional only, 11.1% distant only, and 16.7% locoregional and distant recurrences. Six-month LC, DMFS, and OS were 80.5%, 83.4%, and 69.1%, respectively. One-year LC, DMFS, and OS were 67.1%, 83.4%, and 27%, respectively. Acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 23% of patients, with 1 acute grade 5 toxicity secondary to esophageal hemorrhage, unclear if related to reRT or disease progression. No grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported. Conclusions: In the largest report to date of PBT for reRT in patients with recurrent EC, we observed acceptable acute toxicities and encouraging rates of disease control. However, these findings are limited by the poor prognoses of these patients, who are at high risk of mortality. Further research is needed to better assess the long-term benefits and toxicities of PBT in this specific patient population.

Identifiers

PMID38596455
PMCPMC11002543
OpenAlexW4391569136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.