Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596319›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2024

Ketamine-based Sedation Use in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Ohoud Aljuhani, Khalid Al Sulaiman, Ghazwa B Korayem, Ali F Altebainawi, Abdulrahman Alshaya, Majed Nahari, Khuzama Alsamnan, Munirah A Alkathiri, Bodoor S Al-Dosari, Abeer A Alenazi and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Ohoud AljuhaniDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Al SulaimanPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghazwa B KorayemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ali F AltebainawiPharmaceutical Care Services, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail Health Cluster, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlshayaPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed NahariPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khuzama AlsamnanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Munirah A AlkathiriPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bodoor S Al-DosariPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer A AlenaziPharmaceutical Care Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Samiah AlsohimiPharmaceutical Care Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lina I AlnajjarDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Mashael AlfaifiPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nora AlQussairPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem M AlanaziCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Munirah F AlhmoudCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nadin L AlanaziPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hadeel AlkofideDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aljawharah M AleneziCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ramesh VishwakarmaNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SARiyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SAKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAKing Saud University · SAUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Ketamine possesses analgesia, anti-inflammation, anticonvulsant, and neuroprotection properties. However, the evidence that supports its use in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19 is insufficient. The study's goal was to assess ketamine's effectiveness and safety in critically ill, mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with COVID-19. Methods: Adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 were included in a multicenter retrospective-prospective cohort study. Patients admitted between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021, to five ICUs in Saudi Arabia were included. Eligible patients who required MV within 24 hours of ICU admission were divided into two sub-cohort groups based on their use of ketamine (Control vs. Ketamine). The primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. P/F ratio differences, lactic acid normalization, MV duration, and mortality were considered secondary outcomes. Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:2 ratio) based on the selected criteria. Results: In total, 1,130 patients met the eligibility criteria. Among these, 1036 patients (91.7 %) were in the control group, whereas 94 patients (8.3 %) received ketamine. The total number of patients after PS matching, was 264 patients, including 88 patients (33.3 %) who received ketamine. The ketamine group's LOS was significantly lower (beta coefficient (95 % CI): -0.26 (-0.45, -0.07), P = 0.008). Furthermore, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly improved 24 hours after the start of ketamine treatment compared to the pre-treatment period (6 hours) (124.9 (92.1, 184.5) vs. 106 (73.1, 129.3; P = 0.002). Additionally, the ketamine group had a substantially shorter mean time for lactic acid normalization (beta coefficient (95 % CI): -1.55 (-2.42, -0.69), P 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the duration of MV or mortality. Conclusions: Ketamine-based sedation was associated with lower hospital LOS and faster lactic acid normalization but no mortality benefits in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, larger prospective studies are recommended to assess the safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative in critically ill adult patients.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)COVID-19Critically illIntensive care units (ICUs)KetamineLactic AcidLength of StayMortalityOxygenation parameterPaO2/FiO2 ratioSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38596319
PMCPMC11002878
OpenAlexW4393851780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.