Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596295›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Oncology2024

Promising immunotherapy targets: TIM3, LAG3, and TIGIT joined the party.

Chenyu Lu, Yuanyan Tan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Immunotherapy for Cancer: Current Advances and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chenyu LuJockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuanyan TanInstitute of Advanced Biotechnology and School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.
City University of Hong Kong · HKShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great promise as immunotherapy for restoring T cell function and reactivating anti-tumor immunity. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab, in 2011 for advanced melanoma patients, leading to significant improvements in survival rates. Subsequently, other immune checkpoint-targeting antibodies were tested. Currently, seven ICIs, namely ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), pembrolizumab, nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1]), atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and cemiplimab (anti-PD-L1), have been approved for various cancer types. However, the efficacy of antibodies targeting CTLA4 or PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains suboptimal. Consequently, ongoing studies are evaluating the next generation of ICIs, such as lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG3), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing 3 (TIM3), and T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT). Our review provides a summary of clinical trials evaluating these novel immune checkpoints in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

cancer treatmentclinical trialsICIsimmune check inhibitorsLAG3MT: Novel therapeutic targets and biomarker development Special IssueTIGITTIM3

Identifiers

PMID38596295
PMCPMC10905042
OpenAlexW4391749566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.