ArticleHeliyon2024
Circuital modelling in muscle tissue impedance measurements.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) stands as a widely employed characterization technique for studying muscular tissue in both physio/pathological conditions. This methodology commonly involves modeling tissues through equivalent electrical circuits, facilitating a correlation between electrical parameters and physiological properties. Within existing literature, diverse equivalent electrical circuits have been proposed, varying in complexity and fitting properties. However, to date, none have definitively proven to be the most suiTable for tissue impedance measurements. This study aims to outline a systematic methodology for EIS measurements and to compare the performances of three widely used electrical circuits in characterizing both physiological and pathological muscle tissue conditions. Results highlight that, for optimal fitting with electrical parameters relevant to tissue characterization, the choice of the circuit to be fitted closely hinges on the specific measurement objectives, including measurement parameters and associated physiological features. Naturally, this necessitates a balance between simplicity and fitting accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.