Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596089›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A nested grouped random parameter negative binomial model for modeling segment-level crash counts.

Omar Almutairi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Omar AlmutairiCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a nested grouped random parameter negative binomial framework is proposed to model crash counts at the segment level, a three-level longitudinal framework. The proposed model accounts for correlations along county routes and over time and thus includes a time variable, the year index, to analyze crash counts. The model is applied to crashes on undivided two-lane arterial roads in Ohio from 2012 to 2017. The results present two variants of the model: one with varying intercepts and fixed slopes and the other with varying intercepts and slopes. Both variants have comparable interpretations concerning the fixed parameters, but the latter variant exhibits a significantly improved fit and provides additional information on the interpretations. The results show a significant quadratic relationship between the time variable and the crash count, indicating that, on average, the crash count of segments increases with a decreasing rate as time variable increases. Regarding random parameters, the findings show that 17% of segments within routes and 2% of routes exhibit crash counts that decrease at accelerating downward trend as time variable increases. The effect of the natural logarithm of the segment length varies significantly across different routes, with an increase in this value primarily leading to an increase in crashes. On the other hand, the effect of the total shoulder width also varies across routes, but unlike the former, an increase in this value generally results in a decrease in crashes. The proposed model shows high forecast accuracy for crash count prediction, making it a valuable tool for informed decision-making in safety improvement.

Indexed as

Correlations along county routesLongitudinal dataNegative binomial modelRandom parametersTemporal correlationTotal crashes

Identifiers

PMID38596089
PMCPMC11002225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.