ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimizing metal part distortion in the material extrusion-thermal debinding-sintering process: An experimental and numerical study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thermal debinding-sintering process plays an essential role in the context of material extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) for producing parts using metal injection molding (MIM). During thermal debinding, metal parts often experience material distortion and porosity, which negatively impacts their mechanical properties. Slowing down the debinding speed is a common approach to mitigate material distortion and porosity. However, this leads to a significant increase in the debinding time. In this study, we carried out debinding-sintering experiments to optimize the distortion and porosity in metal parts. These metal parts were manufactured utilizing bronze/polylactide (PLA) blend filaments and placed in crucibles of different sizes (small, medium, and large), with different heating rates and holding times. The results revealed that the small crucible yielded higher porosity levels in the metal parts, which could be reduced from 23% to 12% by extending both the heating and holding times. In contrast, the medium crucible managed to reduce porosity to approximately 15% without requiring an extension of the processing time. The large crucible, on the other hand, couldn't achieve further porosity reduction due to challenges in reaching the desired temperature. To gain a deeper insight into temperature distribution during the debinding process, we performed numerical simulations using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique and obtained temperature profiles within the kiln using the three crucibles. Ultimately, we carried out standard mechanical tests on the resulting metal parts and evaluated the thermal debinding procedure under various conditions. The approach we employed, combining experiments and numerical simulations, demonstrated significant promise for enhancing the quality of metal parts in the thermal debinding-sintering process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.