ArticleHeliyon2024
Performance of anterior segment OCT-based algorithms in the opportunistic screening for primary angle-closure disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Assessment of Anterior Segment OCT Parameters and Their Association with Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle-Closure Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the performance of deep learning algorithms in the opportunistic screening for primary angle-closure disease (PACD) using combined anterior segment parameters. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional hospital-based study. Patients with PACD and healthy controls who underwent comprehensive eye examinations, including gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) examinations under both light and dark conditions, were consecutively enrolled from the Department of Ophthalmology at the Beijing Tongren Hospital between November 2020 and June 2022. The anterior chamber, anterior chamber angle, iris, and lens parameters were assessed using ASOCT. To build the prediction models, backward logistic regression was utilized to select the variables to discriminate patients with PACD from normal participants, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of the opportunistic screening. Results: The data from 199 patients (199 eyes) were included in the final analysis and divided into two groups: PACD (109 eyes) and controls (90 eyes). Angle opening distance at 500 μm, anterior chamber area, and iris curvature measured in the light condition were included in the final prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.968, with a sensitivity of 91.74 % and a specificity of 91.11 %. Conclusion: ASOCT-based algorithms showed excellent diagnostic performance in the opportunistic screening for PACD. These results provide a promising basis for future research on the development of an angle-closure probability scoring system for PACD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.