Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596001›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Classification of Chest CT Lung Nodules Using Collaborative Deep Learning Model.

Khalaf Alshamrani, Hassan A Alshamrani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Khalaf AlshamraniRadiological Sciences Department, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-1752
Hassan A AlshamraniRadiological Sciences Department, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Najran University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of lung cancer through accurate diagnosis of malignant lung nodules using chest CT scans offers patients the highest chance of successful treatment and survival. Despite advancements in computer vision through deep learning algorithms, the detection of malignant nodules faces significant challenges due to insufficient training datasets. Methods: This study introduces a model based on collaborative deep learning (CDL) to differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous nodules in chest CT scans with limited available data. The model dissects a nodule into its constituent parts using six characteristics, allowing it to learn detailed features of lung nodules. It utilizes a CDL submodel that incorporates six types of feature patches to fine-tune a network previously trained with ResNet-50. An adaptive weighting method learned through error backpropagation enhances the process of identifying lung nodules, incorporating these CDL submodels for improved accuracy. Results: The CDL model demonstrated a high level of performance in classifying lung nodules, achieving an accuracy of 93.24%. This represents a significant improvement over current state-of-the-art methods, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the CDL model, with its unique structure and adaptive weighting method, offers a promising solution to the challenge of accurately detecting malignant lung nodules with limited data. This approach not only improves diagnostic accuracy but also contributes to the early detection and treatment of lung cancer, potentially saving lives.

Indexed as

collaborative deep learningCT imageslogistic regressionlung cancernodulesradial lengthstandard deviation

Identifiers

PMID38596001
PMCPMC11002784
OpenAlexW4393942699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.