Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38595955›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Syphilis Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Investigating Nonpenicillin Therapeutic Strategies.

Gustavo Yano Callado, Maria Celidonio Gutfreund, Isabele Pardo, Mariana Kim Hsieh, Vivian Lin, Mindy Marie Sampson, Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, Tássia Aporta Marins, Rodrigo Octávio Deliberato, Marinês Dalla Valle Martino and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A complex presentation of complicated secondary syphilis with ulcerated lesion progression.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gustavo Yano CalladoFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6569
Maria Celidonio GutfreundFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabele PardoFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Kim HsiehFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vivian LinFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mindy Marie SampsonDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Guillermo Rodriguez NavaDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Tássia Aporta MarinsFaculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário de Adamantina, Adamantina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Octávio DeliberatoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Marinês Dalla Valle MartinoFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marisa HolubarDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-1809
Jorge L SalinasDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Alexandre R MarraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRStanford University · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USSolução Ambiental Assessoria e Consultoria · BRUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Penicillin's long-standing role as the reference standard in syphilis treatment has led to global reliance. However, this dependence presents challenges, prompting the need for alternative strategies. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of these alternative treatments against nonneurological syphilis. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to 28 August 2023, and we included studies that compared penicillin or amoxicillin monotherapy to other treatments for the management of nonneurological syphilis. Our primary outcome was serological cure rates. Random-effect models were used to obtain pooled mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Results: Of 6478 screened studies, 27 met the inclusion criteria, summing 6710 patients. The studies were considerably homogeneous, and stratified analyses considering each alternative treatment separately revealed that penicillin monotherapy did not outperform ceftriaxone (pooled odds ratio, 1.66 [95% confidence interval, .97-2.84]; Conclusions: Alternative treatment strategies have serological cure rates equivalent to penicillin, potentially reducing global dependence on this antibiotic.

Indexed as

efficacy comparisonnonneurological syphilispenicillinsyphilis treatmenttreatment alternatives

Identifiers

PMID38595955
PMCPMC11002953
OpenAlexW4392763670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.