Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38595914›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Evaluating the Knowledge, Practice, and Regulatory Situation of Veterinary Experts Regarding Counterfeit Veterinary Medications in the Selected Districts of Central Gondar Zone, Ethiopia.

Yesuneh Tefera Mekasha, Sete Nigussie, Wegayehu Ashagre, Melaku Getahun Feleke, Abibo Wondie, Asnakew Mulaw, Bereket Dessalegn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yesuneh Tefera MekashaDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, and Regulatory Affairs, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-7088
Sete NigussieDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Wegayehu AshagreDoctor of Veterinary Medicine, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Melaku Getahun FelekeDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Analysis, and Quality Assurance, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0009-0001-8780-2385
Abibo WondieDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacy, Drug Supply Chain Management, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asnakew MulawDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-125X
Bereket DessalegnDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-7324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The intentional and illegal misrepresentation of fake medications involves falsely indicating their source. These fraudulent medications can include products that contain either accurate or incorrect ingredients, lack proper labeling, have insufficient quantities of ingredients, and are packaged with counterfeit packaging. This unlawful activity has led to treatment failures, the development of antibiotic resistance, adverse effects, and even deaths. Hence, the objective of this study was to assess the knowledge, practice, and regulatory status of veterinary drug experts in the central Gondar zone of Ethiopia regarding counterfeit veterinary medications. Methods: From January 2023 to July 2023, a self-administered structured questionnaire was utilized to conduct a cross-sectional study in Central Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. The analysis of the data involved the application of descriptive and chi-square tests. Results: The study revealed that the majority of professionals possessed a work experience ranging from 5 to 9 years (23; 56.1%). Additionally, a total of 25 individuals (61.0%) who participated in the research had not undergone any kind of training. It was observed that a significant proportion of participants (82.9%) possessed knowledge about counterfeit veterinary drugs. Only about 63% and 36% of respondents had high knowledge and good practice concerning veterinary counterfeit drugs, respectively. Only 29.3% of participants have reported practices. Furthermore, a poor regulatory level of coordination was detected (85.4%). The study revealed a significant (χ2 =7.6165; p = 0.022) disparity between the respondents' practice levels and training. Respondents' regulatory levels were also significantly associated (p < 0.05) with their sex (χ2 = 13.34; p = 0.001) and work experience (χ2 = 13.64; p = 0.033). The research findings also revealed a noteworthy correlation between practice and regulatory activity (χ2 = 15.0463; p = 0.005). Conclusion: The study outlines the necessity of awareness initiatives, with a focus on the significance of veterinary experts' knowledge, practice, and regulatory efforts in addressing the issue of counterfeit veterinary medications.

Indexed as

central Gondar zonecounterfeit veterinary drugcross-sectional studyEthiopiaknowledgepracticeregulatory activityveterinary drug professionals

Identifiers

PMID38595914
PMCPMC11001539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.