ArticleCureus2024
Spontaneous Cecal Perforation During Pregnancy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous perforation of the colon is a rare disease defined as sudden perforation of a healthy colon without evidence of trauma or disease. These perforations are typically classified as either stercoral or idiopathic. Cecal perforation during pregnancy is an uncommon and potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt recognition and surgical intervention. We present a case of a 33-year-old woman at 29 weeks and three days gestation presenting with spontaneous cecal perforation. She presented to the emergency department with diffuse abdominal pain and distention lasting for three days, associated with nausea and vomiting. Following evaluation, she was diagnosed with diffuse peritonitis. The diagnosis of this condition relies on both the clinical presentation and the utilization of radiographic imaging. The patient underwent an emergent explorative laparotomy with prompt surgical intervention to repair the 1.2 x 0.8 cm perforation found on her distended cecum. The surgical repair consisted of the excision of the edges and the primary suture of the perforation with an omental patch. Her post-procedure course was uneventful, and she later delivered a healthy baby at full term. This case highlights the importance of considering uncommon causes of acute abdominal pain in pregnant women to ensure timely diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.