ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Performance of a vaginal self-collection device versus clinician collected cervical samples for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Veil-Based Collector Device Enabling Self-Collected Cervicovaginal Sampling for Site-of-Care Primary HPV-Based Cervical Cancer and Sexually Transmitted Infections Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Study in Romania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Performance of a New Brazilian Self-Sampling Device for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Screening.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Differential Uptake and Release of Female Genital Secretions Components and HPV DNA by Veil, Swab, and Vaginal Tampon.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Syndemic Synergy of HPV, HIV, and HSV-2 for Oncogenic HPV Replication in Female Sex Workers.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Successful Retrieval of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Veil-Based Collected Female Genital Secretions After Long-Term Storage in Universal Transport Medium.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling among women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Screening for cervical cancer requires the participation of target women. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be performed on vaginal self-samples and self-sampling can improve this participation. This study aims to validate the performance of the vaginal self-sampling device (Vitroveil®) to detect high risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in comparison to clinician collected samples and evaluate the degree of acceptability of the Vitroveil® device. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a cohort of 385 participating women (median age of 44 ± 10.47 years) attending primary care centers and cervical pathology services of Granada, Spain. Two paired samples (vaginal self-sample and clinician collected cervical sample) where collected from each participant to compare the detection of HPV with the Vitro HPV Screening assay (Vitro, Granada, Spain). A questionnaire was also provided to the participants to analyze the degree of satisfaction with the device and the preference for sampling method. Results: Overall concordance for hrHPV detection was substantial (ĸ 0.804). The prevalence of any hrHPV infection was higher in self-collected samples (30.6%) than in clinician-collected samples (24.3%). The participants found the self-sampling device easy to use and preferred self-collection as the collection method. Conclusion: The Vitroveil® self-sampling device enables safe and accruable hrHPV testing, obtaining equivalent results to those of the clinician collected samples. High acceptability of the device has been demonstrated among women in the study. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to verify the efficacy and reliability of the device's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.