ReviewPreventive medicine reports2024
Rehabilitative effects of Baduanjin in Chinese stroke patients: A systematic review and
Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Baduanjin Exercise on lung function and 6 min walk in COPD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of the effects of different traditional Chinese exercises on improving the motor function of stroke survivors: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Models Containing the Braden Scale Predict Activities of Daily Living Improvement in Post-Stroke Hemiplegia: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Optimal exercise modalities for enhancing motor function recovery after stroke: a Bayesian systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to systematically assess the rehabilitative effects of Baduanjin in stroke patients. Methods: Ten electronic databases were systematically searched using MeSH and free terms for relevant studies written in the English or Chinese language, and published on or before 15 February 2023. Studies in which Baduanjin was the only difference in treatment administered to experimental and control groups were included in the review. The studies' risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane criteria. Results: Twenty one studies that involved 1,649 participants were included. Compared to the control group, Baduanjin increased the scores for the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (including both upper and lower extremity components), Berg Balance Scale, Trunk Impairment Scale, Functional Ambulation Categories, 6-minute Walking Distance, Modified Barthel Index, Barthel Index, and total effective rate, but reduced the scores for the Pk254 balance function detection system, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and neurological deficit scale ( Conclusion: The present study findings revealed the potential benefits of Baduanjin in improving movement, balance, trunk, ambulation and neurological functions, and the ability to perform activities of daily living in stroke patients. Larger randomized controlled trials with more standardized intervention protocols are required to obtain more robust evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.