ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Evaluation of the Efficacy of LASER, Desensitizing Agents, and their Combined Effect on Dentinal Hypersensitivity in Bicuspids:
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Dentin Remineralization and Tubule Occlusion Using Titanium Dioxide-Doped Phosphate Glass and Diode Laser: An In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Effect of eggshell nanoparticles and fluoride varnish, with and without diode laser, on dentinal tubule occlusion (An in vitro study).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of nano-hydroxyapatite dentifrice, diode laser alone and combined for dentin hypersensitivity: A randomized clinical trial.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Role of diode laser (810 nm) and/or fluoride varnish for the treatment of gamma-irradiated hypersensitive human dentin (An in vitro study).Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to know the potential of diode light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) and desensitizing agents on blocking the dentinal tubules, which may further help in reducing the most common dental problem named dentinal hypersensitivity (DH). Materials and Methods: Sixty human permanent bicuspids were selected, and preparation was performed in the cervical region measuring 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm, followed by acid etching for 15 seconds. These are then divided according to the groups mentioned: group 1-nano-hydroxyapatite (HA) was applied for 15 minutes; group 2-biosilicate was applied for 15 minutes; group 3-diode LASER application was performed twice for 60 seconds in noncontact mode; group 4-nano-HA plus diode LASER application; and group 5-biosilicate plus diode LASER application. The same procedure was followed on the 1 Result: The maximum dentinal tubular occlusion was observed in group 4, where nano-HA and diode LASER application was performed. Conclusion: All the investigated treatment groups have promising occluding potential, but the maximum was found in group 4 >group 5 >group 3 >group 1 >group 2. LASER plus desensitizing together prove to be potent and effective in reducing dentinal tubular diameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.