Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38595461›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

A Preliminary Report of Maximum Voluntary Bite Force of Young Indian Population.

Madhu Ranjan, Bishnupati Singh, Surender Kumar, Tushar, Priya Rani, Anupama Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madhu RanjanAssociate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Bishnupati SinghAdditional Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Surender KumarAssociate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
TusharTutor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Priya RaniTutor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Anupama SinghEx-Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The measurement of bite force is increasingly gaining importance in dentistry. This preliminary report evaluates the maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) of young healthy individuals with normal occlusion and correlates the effect of age and gender with the maximum bite force (MBF). Materials and Methods: 405 participants in the age group of 18 to 40 years were selected from the outpatient department meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. MVBF was measured with the help of a digital device called "Byte" at incisors, right first molar, and left first molar region. Results: There was a strong correlation between age with bite force. Bite force increased with age. Males had more bite force than females. The posterior region had higher bite force than the anterior region. Conclusion: Measurement of bite force is very important for every patient undergoing restorative treatment. The "Byte" device was found to be very efficient.

Indexed as

Bite forcemasticatory forceocclusal forcestomatognathic system

Identifiers

PMID38595461
PMCPMC11001091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.