ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Evaluation of the Curing of the Primer on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An Original Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of separately curing the unfilled resin for increased bond strength of the orthodontic brackets as the literature shows both studies that support and contradict this aspect. Methodology: The sample consisted of 120 specimens randomly grouped into four of 30. The tooth was cleaned of tissue and debris and stored in a distilled water solution until the procedures of bonding. The surface of the enamel was conditioned with pumice, and acrylic blocks were designed for the tooth to be mounted onto them. The buccal surfaces of all the teeth were prepared by etching the enamel with 37% phosphoric acid for a time period of 30 seconds and washed for 20 seconds under running water. Stainless steel brackets (Victory Series™ MBT, 0.022 Slot) were used for all the samples in the study, and the bonding procedure was conducted on the same day for all the groups. The artificial saliva was used for the storage of samples for 24 h after bonding, and shear bond strength testing was conducted using an Instron machine in shear or peel mode at a crosshead speed. Results: The highest mean bond strength calculated was for the conventional technique (17.45 mpa), while it was the lowest for no primer adhesive (11.21 mpa). Group IV had a greater distribution of ARI scores than groups I, II, and III. Conclusion: Group IV achieved the highest bond strength when compared to other groups, with an ARI score of 3. Group III had less bond strength, likely due to incomplete curing of the primer due to insufficient exposure to light. Transbond XT can be used without primer, making bonding, debonding, and cleaning procedures easy and less time-consuming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.