ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Predictive Value of a Diagnostic Five-Gene Biomarker for Pediatric Sepsis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-depth bioinformatics analysis uncovers the crosstalk genes and immune interactions among diagnostic markers linked to natural killer cells in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Multi-omics exploration of chaperone-mediated immune-proteostasis crosstalk in vascular dementia and identification of diagnostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric sepsis has a very high morbidity and mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic biomarkers and immune cell infiltration in pediatric sepsis. Methods: Three datasets (GSE13904, GSE26378, and GSE26440) were downloaded from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. After identifying overlapping genes in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and modular sepsis genes selected via a weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) in the GSE26378 dataset, pivotal genes were further identified by using LASSO regression and random forest analysis to construct a diagnostic model. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to validate the efficacy of the diagnostic model for pediatric sepsis. Furthermore, we used qRT-PCR to detect the expression levels of pivotal genes and validate the diagnostic model's ability to diagnose pediatric sepsis in 65 actual clinical samples. Results: Among 294 overlapping genes of DEGs and modular sepsis genes, five pivotal genes (STOM, MS4A4A, CD177, MMP8, and MCEMP1) were screened to construct a diagnostic model of pediatric sepsis. The expression of the five pivotal genes was higher in the sepsis group than in the normal group. The diagnostic model showed good diagnostic ability with AUCs of 1, 0.986, and 0.968. More importantly, the diagnostic model showed good diagnostic ability with AUCs of 0.937 in the 65 clinical samples and showed better efficacy compared to conventional inflammatory indicators such as procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil percentage (NEU%). Conclusion: We developed and tested a five-gene diagnostic model that can reliably identify pediatric sepsis and also suggest prospective candidate genes for peripheral blood diagnostic testing in pediatric sepsis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.