Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594944›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering2024

Accelerating Diverse Cell-Based Therapies Through Scalable Design.

Emma L Peterman, Deon S Ploessl, Kate E Galloway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. EngineeringFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma L PetermanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; email: katiegal@mit.edu.
Deon S PloesslDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; email: katiegal@mit.edu.
Kate E GallowayDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; email: katiegal@mit.edu.

Funding

Multiscale tools and approaches for understanding and engineering cell-fate transitionsR35GM143033 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GALLOWAY, KATE ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Augmenting cells with novel, genetically encoded functions will support therapies that expand beyond natural capacity for immune surveillance and tissue regeneration. However, engineering cells at scale with transgenic cargoes remains a challenge in realizing the potential of cell-based therapies. In this review, we introduce a range of applications for engineering primary cells and stem cells for cell-based therapies. We highlight tools and advances that have launched mammalian cell engineering from bioproduction to precision editing of therapeutically relevant cells. Additionally, we examine how transgenesis methods and genetic cargo designs can be tailored for performance. Altogether, we offer a vision for accelerating the translation of innovative cell-based therapies by harnessing diverse cell types, integrating the expanding array of synthetic biology tools, and building cellular tools through advanced genome writing techniques.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsCell EngineeringGene EditingHumansStem CellsSynthetic Biologybiomanufacturingcell-based therapiescellular engineeringgenome editingstem cellssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID38594944
PMCPMC12138613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.