Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594913›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Incorporation of vasa previa screening into a routine anomaly scan: A single center cohort study.

Millicent Nwandison, Elizabeth Daly-Jones, Alexandra Drought, Lisa Story, Philippe De-Rosnay, Neil Sebire, David Nyberg, Yinka Oyelese

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fetoscopic laser ablation vs standard management for Type-II and Type-III vasa previa.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Millicent NwandisonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-9223
Elizabeth Daly-JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Alexandra DroughtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Lisa StoryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-9592
Philippe De-RosnayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Neil SebireNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Center, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
David NybergKensington Medical Chambers, London, UK.
Yinka OyeleseDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1509-0152
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBBoston Children's Hospital · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKensington Health · CAKing's College London · GB

Funding

Funding for open access was provided by The International Vasa Previa Foundation. The funder had no input in or influence on the manuscript.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVasa previa (VP), defined as unprotected fetal vessels traversing the membranes over the cervix, is associated with a high perinatal mortality when undiagnosed prenatally. Conversely, prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound and cesarean delivery before the membranes rupture is associated with excellent outcomes. However, controversy exists regarding screening for VP. In the UK, routine screening for VP is not recommended. The objective of this study was to report the incidence of VP and our experience in the detection of VP with a universal screening protocol at the time of the second-trimester fetal anomaly scan with third-trimester confirmation in an unselected population of pregnancies. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a single-center historical cohort study of all pregnant women who underwent routine second-trimester anomaly screening scans at West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK, between 2012 and 2016. Over 5 years, every patient undergoing routine anomaly screening was evaluated for VP using a systematic protocol during their 20-week anomaly scan. Suspected cases of VP were rescanned in the third trimester by specialist sonographers with an interest in VP. The primary outcomes were the incidence and detection of VP.

resultsDuring the study period, 24 690 anatomy scans were performed. A total of 64 patients were identified as having potential VP at the second-trimester anomaly screening scan, of which 19 were confirmed by the specialist sonographer in the third trimester and at delivery. The screen positive rate was 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20%-0.32%). VP at birth was found in 19/24690 births (1:1299 [95% CI: 1:832-1:2030] births). Universal screening for VP using our protocol had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.78% (95% CI: 99.72%-99.84%). The false-positive rate of the second-trimester screen was 0.18% (95% CI: 0.13-0.24). There were no false positives or false negatives at delivery. Of the 19 patients with confirmed VP, 17 had scheduled cesarean deliveries, and two required emergency deliveries due to antepartum hemorrhage. One baby died, giving a perinatal mortality of 5%.

conclusionsVP complicates approximately 1:1300 pregnancies. Routine screening for VP yielded a 100% detection rate. We suggest the inclusion of structured VP assessment in standard fetal anomaly screening programs.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Trimester, SecondUltrasonography, PrenatalVasa PreviaAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidencePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdUnited Kingdomincidenceplacenta previaprenatal diagnosisprenatal ultrasoundscreeningvasa previa

Identifiers

PMID38594913
PMCPMC11168266
OpenAlexW4394685548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.