Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594841›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2024

Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: Effectiveness and safety of 4th and 5th lines of treatment.

Bénédicte Caron, Alexandre Habert, Olivier Bonsack, Houda Camara, Elodie Jeanbert, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Patrick Netter, Silvio Danese, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bénédicte CaronDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Alexandre HabertDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Olivier BonsackDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Houda CamaraUnit of Methodology, Data Management and Statistic, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Elodie JeanbertUnit of Methodology, Data Management and Statistic, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Tommaso Lorenzo ParigiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-0231
Patrick NetterIngénierie Moléculaire et Ingénierie Articulaire (IMoPA), UMR-7365 CNRS, Faculté de Médecine, University of Lorraine and University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Silvio DaneseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-1351
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-6618
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRInserm · FRVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have signs or symptoms of active disease despite multiple treatment attempts. This emerging concept is defined as difficult-to-treat IBD.

aimThe objective of this study was to investigate for the first time the treatment persistence, efficacy and safety of biologics or small molecules used in 4th or 5th line therapy.

methodsWe reviewed all consecutive patients with IBD treated at the Nancy University Hospital between July 2022 and April 2023 with the 4th or 5th line treatment for at least three months. The primary outcome was to assess the persistence rate of 4th and 5th line therapy.

resultsWe enrolled 82 patients with IBD (4th line: 44; 5th line: 38). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the duration of risankizumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) as 4th and 5th line treatment. The restricted mean survival time analysis showed that the persistence rate of risankizumab was the highest as 4th line therapy (risankizumab vs. vedolizumab: 36.0 and 29.4 weeks, respectively, p = 0.008; risankizumab vs. ustekinumab: 36.0 and 32.8 weeks, respectively, p = 0.035). In multivariate regression, Crohn's disease diagnosis (Odd ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.7-12.4) was significantly associated with treatment persistence.

conclusionIn this first real-world setting, risankizumab could have a longer persistence rate as 4th line treatment for IBD than other agents. Persistence of biological agents was greater in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to compare treatment efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat IBD.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInflammatory Bowel DiseasesUstekinumabAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiological ProductsGastrointestinal AgentsrisankizumabUstekinumabvedolizumabCrohn's diseaseinflammatory bowel diseaserisankizumabulcerative colitisustekinumabvedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID38594841
PMCPMC11176900
OpenAlexW4394687910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.