Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594812›Full record

Trial reportMovement disorders clinical practice2024

Opicapone to Treat Early Wearing-off in Parkinson's Disease Patients: The Korean ADOPTION Trial.

Jee-Young Lee, Hyeo-Il Ma, Joaquim J Ferreira, José-Francisco Rocha, Young Hee Sung, In-Uk Song, Tae-Beom Ahn, Do Young Kwon, Sang-Myung Cheon, Jong-Min Kim and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Jee-Young LeeDepartment of Neurology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9120-2075
Hyeo-Il MaDepartment of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-9779
Joaquim J FerreiraIMM - Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3950-5113
José-Francisco RochaBIAL - Portela & Ca S.A, Coronado, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-4850
Young Hee SungGachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2840-1338
In-Uk SongThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0181-0844
Tae-Beom AhnKyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7315-6298
Do Young KwonKorea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-622X
Sang-Myung CheonDong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5905-2188
Jong-Min KimSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-3997
Chong Sik LeeAsan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3474-0440
Phil Hyu LeeSeverance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9931-8462
Jeong-Ho ParkSoon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3562-2737
Jae-Hyeok LeePusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-7415
Mee Young ParkYeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-1634
Sang Jin KimInje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-2154
Jong Sam BaikInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-203X
Seong-Min ChoiChonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3138-1881
Hae-Won ShinChung-ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6050-7733
Ho-Won LeeKyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-920X
Suk Yun KangDongtan Sacred Heart Hospital Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-3624
Beomseok JeonDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-3544
SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KRAnsan University · KRAsan Medical Center · KRBial (Portugal) · PTBucheon University · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KRDong-A University Hospital · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRInje University Busan Paik Hospital · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRKyung Hee University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRSacred Heart Hospital · USSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSeverance Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Laboratórios Bial - Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A, Portugal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing levodopa (L-dopa)/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) daily dose or adding a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor to levodopa/DDCI therapy are strategies used to manage wearing-off symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.

objectivesTo evaluate the COMT inhibitor opicapone versus an additional dose of levodopa to treat early wearing-off in PD patients.

methodsADOPTION was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label, Phase 4 study conducted in Korea. At baseline, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to opicapone 50 mg (n = 87) or L-dopa 100 mg (n = 81) (added to current L-dopa/DDCI therapy) for 4 weeks. The main efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to end of study in absolute off time. Other endpoints included changes in on time, in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and 8-item PD Questionnaire scores, and the Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Improvement/Change.

resultsThe adjusted mean in absolute off time was significantly greater for opicapone 50 mg than for L-dopa 100 mg (-62.1 vs. -16.7 minutes; P = 0.0015). Opicapone-treated patients also reported a greater reduction in the percentage of off time (P = 0.0015), a greater increase in absolute on time (P = 0.0338) and a greater increase in the percentage of on time (P = 0.0015). There were no significant differences in other secondary endpoints. The L-dopa equivalent daily dose was significantly higher in the opicapone group (750.9 vs. 690.0 mg; P = 0.0247), when a 0.5 conversion factor is applied.

conclusionsOpicapone 50 mg was more effective than an additional 100 mg L-dopa dose at decreasing off time in patients with PD and early wearing-off.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsLevodopaOxadiazolesParkinson DiseaseAgedCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaTreatment OutcomeAntiparkinson AgentsCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsLevodopaopicaponeOxadiazoleslevodopaopicaponeParkinson's diseasewearing off

Identifiers

PMID38594812
PMCPMC11145137
OpenAlexW4394684863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.