Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594744›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2024

Serotype diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated in Italian pig farms from 2015 to 2022.

Flavia Guarneri, Claudia Romeo, Federico Scali, Simona Zoppi, Nicoletta Formenti, Antonio Marco Maisano, Salvatore Catania, Marcelo Gottschalk, G Loris Alborali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Triplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Atypical multidrug-resistant serotype 1Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  8. Characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Flavia GuarneriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Claudia RomeoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy. claudiarosa.romeo@izsler.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-2847
Federico ScaliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Simona ZoppiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Nicoletta FormentiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Antonio Marco MaisanoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Salvatore CataniaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Verona, Italy.
Marcelo GottschalkFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
G Loris AlboraliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta · ITUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Ministero della Salute E55F21002890001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) is a bacterium frequently associated with porcine pleuropneumonia. The acute form of the disease is highly contagious and often fatal, resulting in significant economic losses for pig farmers. Serotype diversity and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of APP strains circulating in north Italian farms from 2015 to 2022 were evaluated retrospectively to investigate APP epidemiology in the area. A total of 572 strains isolated from outbreaks occurring in 337 different swine farms were analysed. The majority of isolates belonged to serotypes 9/11 (39.2%) and 2 (28.1%) and serotype diversity increased during the study period, up to nine different serotypes isolated in 2022. The most common resistances were against tetracycline (53% of isolates) and ampicillin (33%), followed by enrofloxacin, florfenicol and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23% each). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was common, with a third of isolates showing resistance to more than three antimicrobial classes. Resistance to the different classes and MDR varied significantly depending on the serotype. In particular, the widespread serotype 9/11 was strongly associated with florfenicol and enrofloxacin resistance and showed the highest proportion of MDR isolates. Serotype 5, although less common, showed instead a concerning proportion of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance. Our results highlight how the typing of circulating serotypes and the analysis of their antimicrobial susceptibility profile are crucial to effectively manage APP infection and improve antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

Actinobacillus InfectionsActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaePleuropneumoniaSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnrofloxacinFarmsItalyMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesSerogroupSerotypingSulfamethoxazoleSwineThiamphenicolAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnrofloxacinflorfenicolSulfamethoxazoleThiamphenicolTrimethoprimantimicrobial resistanceAPP serotypingporcine pleuropneumoniaSwine disease

Identifiers

PMID38594744
PMCPMC11005290
OpenAlexW4394620674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.