Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594731›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2024

Using mobile health in primiparous women: effect on awareness, attitude and choice of delivery type, semi-experimental.

Fatemeh Moghbeli, Masood Setoodefar, Mohammad Reza Mazaheri Habibi, Zohreh Abbaszadeh, Hanieh Keikhay Moghadam, Sajedeh Salari, Leila Gholamhosseini, Meysam Fallahnezhad, Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh MoghbeliDepartment of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Masood SetoodefarDepartment of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Reza Mazaheri HabibiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zohreh AbbaszadehDepartment of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hanieh Keikhay MoghadamStudent research committee, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sajedeh SalariDepartment of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Leila GholamhosseiniDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Paramedical Sciences, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Meysam FallahnezhadDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali Fatemi AghdaResearch Center for Health Technology Assessment and Medical Informatics, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. afatamy@yahoo.com.
Varastegan Institute for Medical SciencesIran University of Medical Sciences · IRAja University of Medical Sciences · IRKhayyam University · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the reasons for the increase in cesarean section is the lack of knowledge of mothers in choosing the type of delivery. The present study aimed to determine the effect of education through pregnancy application during pregnancy on awareness and attitude and choice of delivery type in primiparous women at Shahid Alavi Specialized Medical Center clinic in Mashhad.

methodsThis study was a semi-experimental type. Seventy primiparous pregnant women who had no restrictions for birth was selected. Sampling was randomized and purpose-based. The data collection tool was a questionnaire. The starting time of the training was considered from the end of the 27th week of pregnancy and continued with regular intervals until the end of the pregnancy. The questionnaires were completed once before the training and once after the training as a pre-test and post-test by the research units. SPSS software (version 26) and MacNemar test and descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

resultsAccording to the results of the MacNemar test, a significant statistical difference was seen between women's knowledge and attitude after the training compared to before (p-value < 0.01). Choosing the type of birth was preferred before and after the training. But following the performance of women showed that only 62.86% of them chose natural birth. In fact, before the training, 40% and after 72.86% of women had chosen birth.

conclusionPregnancy education and application during pregnancy is effective in reducing the choice of cesarean section, so this application with the topic of birth and cesarean section has improved the level of attitude and also the positive attitude of pregnant women towards birth. Creation of facilities and promotion of different methods of painless childbirth and training of maternity staff to perform birth is expected.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionTelemedicineAttitudeFemaleHumansMothersParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeopleApplicationAwarenessEducationNewbornPregnancyPrimiparous womenTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38594731
PMCPMC11005256
OpenAlexW4394693291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.