Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594698›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Automatic measurement of lower limb alignment in portable devices based on deep learning for knee osteoarthritis.

Jianfeng Yang, Peng Ren, Peng Xin, Yiming Wang, Yonglei Ma, Wei Liu, Yu Wang, Yan Wang, Guoqiang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianfeng Yang *Department of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng Ren *Senior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng Xin *Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA Southern Theater Command General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-471X
Yiming WangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yonglei MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wei LiuDamo Academy, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China.
Yu WangDamo Academy, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. yanwang_plagh@163.com.
Guoqiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. gqzhang_plagh@163.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNAlibaba Group (China) · CNGeneral Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor knee osteoarthritis patients, analyzing alignment of lower limbs is essential for therapy, which is currently measured from standing long-leg radiographs of anteroposterior X-ray (LLR) manually. To address the time wasting, poor reproducibility and inconvenience of use caused by existing methods, we present an automated measurement model in portable devices for assessing knee alignment from LLRs.

methodWe created a model and trained it with 837 conforming LLRs, and tested it using 204 LLRs without duplicates in a portable device. Both manual and model measurements were conducted independently, then we recorded knee alignment parameters such as Hip knee ankle angle (HKA), Joint line convergence angle (JCLA), Anatomical mechanical angle (AMA), mechanical Lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical Medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and the time required. We evaluated the model's performance compared with manual results in various metrics.

resultIn both the validation and test sets, the average mean radial errors were 2.778 and 2.447 (P<0.05). The test results for native knee joints showed that 92.22%, 79.38%, 87.94%, 79.82%, and 80.16% of the joints reached angle deviation<1° for HKA, JCLA, AMA, mLDFA, and mMPTA. Additionally, for joints with prostheses, 90.14%, 93.66%, 86.62%, 83.80%, and 85.92% of the joints reached that. The Chi-square test did not reveal any significant differences between the manual and model measurements in subgroups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were less than ± 2° for HKA, JCLA, AMA, and mLDFA, and slightly more than ± 2 degrees for mMPTA.

conclusionThe automatic measurement tool can assess the alignment of lower limbs in portable devices for knee osteoarthritis patients. The results are reliable, reproducible, and time-saving.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeFemurHumansKnee JointLower ExtremityReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTibiaDeep learningKnee osteoarthritisLower limb alignmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38594698
PMCPMC11005281
OpenAlexW4394688169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.