Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594670›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

A nomogram based on the quantitative and qualitative features of CT imaging for the prediction of the invasiveness of ground glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma.

Yantao Yang, Jing Xu, Wei Wang, Mingsheng Ma, Qiubo Huang, Chen Zhou, Jie Zhao, Yaowu Duan, Jia Luo, Jiezhi Jiang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yantao Yang *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jing Xu *Department of Dermatology and Venereal Diseases, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiyan Taihe Hospital (Hubei University of Medicine), Hubei, Shiyan, China.
Mingsheng MaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Qiubo HuangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Chen ZhouDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jie ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Yaowu DuanDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jia LuoDepartment of Pathology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jiezhi JiangDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Lianhua YeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China. Lhye1204@aliyun.com.
Kunming Medical University · CNTaihe Hospital · CNYan'an Hospital Affiliated To Kunming Medical University · CN

Funding

202201AY070001-135 the Yunnan Provincial Basic Research Project82260508 the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaL-2017006 the Yunnan Provincial High-level Health Technical Personnel Training Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBased on the quantitative and qualitative features of CT imaging, a model for predicting the invasiveness of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) was constructed, which could provide a reference value for preoperative planning of GGN patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsAltogether, 702 patients with GGNs (including 748 GGNs) were included in this study. The GGNs operated between September 2020 and July 2022 were classified into the training group (n = 555), and those operated between August 2022 and November 2022 were classified into the validation group (n = 193). Clinical data and the quantitative and qualitative features of CT imaging were harvested from these patients. In the training group, the quantitative and qualitative characteristics in CT imaging of GGNs were analyzed by using performing univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, followed by constructing a nomogram prediction model. The differentiation, calibration, and clinical practicability in both the training and validation groups were assessed by the nomogram models.

resultsIn the training group, multivariate logistic regression analysis disclosed that the maximum diameter (OR = 4.707, 95%CI: 2.06-10.758), consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR) (OR = 1.027, 95%CI: 1.011-1.043), maximum CT value (OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.004-1.047), mean CT value (OR = 1.035, 95%CI: 1.008-1.063; P = 0.012), spiculation sign (OR = 2.055, 95%CI: 1.148-3.679), and vascular convergence sign (OR = 2.508, 95%CI: 1.345-4.676) were independent risk parameters for invasive adenocarcinoma. Based on these findings, we established a nomogram model for predicting the invasiveness of GGN, and the AUC was 0.910 (95%CI: 0.885-0.934) and 0.902 (95%CI: 0.859-0.944) in the training group and the validation group, respectively. The internal validation of the Bootstrap method showed an AUC value of 0.905, indicating a good differentiation of the model. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test for the training and validation groups indicated that the model had a good fitting effect (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the calibration curve and decision analysis curve of the training and validation groups reflected that the model had a good calibration degree and clinical practicability.

conclusionCombined with the quantitative and qualitative features of CT imaging, a nomogram prediction model can be created to forecast the invasiveness of GGNs. This model has good prediction efficacy for the invasiveness of GGNs and can provide help for the clinical management and decision-making of GGNs.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNomogramsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedGround glass noduleInvasivenessLung adenocarcinomaNomogramPrediction modelRadiologic characteristic

Identifiers

PMID38594670
PMCPMC11005224
OpenAlexW4394604248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.