Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594653›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2024

Flipped online teaching of histology and embryology with design thinking: design, practice and reflection.

Yan Guo, Xiaomei Wang, Yang Gao, Haiyan Yin, Qun Ma, Ting Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan GuoCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Xiaomei WangCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Yang GaoCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Haiyan YinCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Qun MaCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China.
Ting ChenAcademic Affair Office, Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Road, Jining, 272067, China. chenting3465@163.com.
Jining Medical University · CN

Funding

Research on classroom teaching reform key program in Jining Medical College [2022] No. 2022KT001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlexible hybrid teaching has become the new normal of basic medical education in the postepidemic era. Identifying ways to improve the quality of curriculum teaching and achieve high-level talent training is a complex problem that urgently needs to be solved. Over the course of the past several semesters, the research team has integrated design thinking (DT) into undergraduate teaching to identify, redesign and solve complex problems in achieving curriculum teaching and professional talent training objectives.

methodsThis study is an observational research. A total of 156 undergraduate stomatology students from Jining Medical University in 2021 were selected to participate in two rounds of online flipped teaching using the design thinking EDIPT (empathy, definition, idea, prototype, and test) method. This approach was applied specifically to the chapters on the respiratory system and female reproductive system. Data collection included student questionnaires, teacher-student interviews, and exam scores. GraphPad Prism software was used for data analysis, and the statistical method was conducted by multiple or unpaired t test.

resultsAccording to the questionnaire results, the flipped classroom teaching design developed using design thinking methods received strong support from the majority of students, with nearly 80% of students providing feedback that they developed multiple abilities during the study process. The interview results indicated that teachers generally believed that using design thinking methods to understand students' real needs, define teaching problems, and devise instructional design solutions, along with testing and promptly adjusting the effectiveness through teaching practices, played a highly positive role in improving teaching and student learning outcomes. A comparison of exam scores showed a significant improvement in the exam scores of the class of 2021 stomatology students in the flipped teaching chapters compared to the class of 2020 stomatology students, and this difference was statistically significant. However, due to the limitation of the experimental chapter scope, there was no significant difference in the overall course grades.

conclusionThe study explores the application of design thinking in histology and embryology teaching, revealing its positive impact on innovative teaching strategies and students' learning experience in medical education. Online flipped teaching, developed through design thinking, proves to be an effective and flexible method that enhances student engagement and fosters autonomous learning abilities.

Indexed as

CurriculumProblem-Based LearningFemaleHumansLearningStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingBasic Medical EducationDesign thinkingFlexible hybrid teachingFlipped teachingHistology and embryology

Identifiers

PMID38594653
PMCPMC11005191
OpenAlexW4394621545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.