ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Radiomics-based discrimination of coronary chronic total occlusion and subtotal occlusion on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Machine-Learning Derived Radiomic Analysis of CT and PET Imaging to Investigate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDifferentiating chronic total occlusion (CTO) from subtotal occlusion (SO) is often difficult to make from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We developed a CCTA-based radiomics model to differentiate CTO and SO.
methodsA total of 66 patients with SO underwent CCTA before invasive angiography and were matched to 66 patients with CTO. Comprehensive imaging analysis was conducted for all lesioned vessels, involving the automatic identification of the lumen within the occluded segment and extraction of 1,904 radiomics features. Radiomics models were then constructed to assess the discriminative value of these features in distinguishing CTO from SO. External validation of the model was performed using data from another medical center.
resultsCompared to SO patients, CTO patients had more blunt stumps (internal: 53/66 (80.3%) vs. 39/66 (59.1%); external: 36/50 (72.0%) vs. 20/50 (40.0%), both p < 0.01), longer lesion length (internal: median length 15.4 mm[IQR: 10.4-22.3 mm] vs. 8.7 mm[IQR: 4.9-12.6 mm]; external:11.8 mm[IQR: 6.1-23.4 mm] vs. 6.2 mm[IQR: 3.5-9.1 mm]; both p < 0.001). Sixteen unique radiomics features were identified after the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. When added to the combined model including imaging features, radiomics features provided increased value for distinguishing CTO from SO (AUC, internal: 0.772 vs. 0.846; p = 0.023; external: 0.718 vs. 0.781, p = 0.146).
conclusionsThe occluded segment vessels of CTO and SO have different radiomics signatures. The combined application of radiomics features and imaging features based on CCTA extraction can enhance diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.