Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594625›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Caesarean delivery on maternal request: the perspective of the postpartum women.

Célia J L Sitoe Muhandule, Cristine M S Benetti, Laura B Fogulin, Silvana F Bento, Eliana Amaral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and Robson classification.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relationship Between Type of Delivery and Growth Trajectory in the First Year of Life: The Araraquara Cohort Study.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of COVID-19 on Brazilian cesarean and prematurity rates: a cross-sectional study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Célia J L Sitoe MuhanduleSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. Box 6081, Campinas, SP, 13084624, Brazil. laicenucha@gmail.com.
Cristine M S BenettiSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. Box 6081, Campinas, SP, 13084624, Brazil.
Laura B FogulinSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. Box 6081, Campinas, SP, 13084624, Brazil.
Silvana F BentoJosé A Pinotti Women's Hospital, Center of Integral Services for the Health of Women (CAISM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Eliana AmaralSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. Box 6081, Campinas, SP, 13084624, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) is an increasing delivery option among women. As such, we aimed to understand the reasons that led pregnant women to request a caesarean delivery.

methodsA phenomenological study was conducted with semi-structured interviews, in a convenience sample, for women who had undergone a CDMR between March and June 2023, in a public reference university hospital in Campinas, Brazil. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis, supported by Nvivo®, and Reshape®.

resultsWe interviewed eighteen women between 21 and 43 years of age. The reasons for C-section as their choice were: 1) fear of labour pain, 2) fear for safety due to maternal or fetal risks, 3) traumatic previous birth experiences of the patient, family or friends 4) sense of control, and 5) lack of knowledge about the risks and benefits of C-section.

conclusionsThe perception of C-section as the painless and safest way to give birth, the movement of giving voice and respecting the autonomy of pregnant women, as well as the national regulation, contribute to the increased rates of surgical abdominal delivery under request. Cultural change concerning childbirth and better counseling could support a more adequate informed decision-making about delivery mode.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionElective Surgical ProceduresDelivery, ObstetricFearFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyCaesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR)C-section on maternal requestElective C-sectionMode of delivery preferenceWomen´s choice childbirth

Identifiers

PMID38594625
PMCPMC11003158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.