Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594584›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Investigation and Comparison of Maternal Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index Coupled with Gestational Weight Gain on Maternal-Fetal Complications Based on US and Chinese Guidelines: A Retrospective Study.

Wan-Ju Kung, Hsin-Yi Kuo, Ching-Feng Chang, Yeong-Hwa Zen, Ching-Chiang Lin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wan-Ju Kung *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yi Kuo *Department of Midwifery and Maternal-Infant Health Care, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ching-Feng ChangDepartment of Nursing, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yeong-Hwa ZenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Ching-Chiang LinDepartment of Education and Research, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan. x6053@ms25.hinet.net.ORCID 0000-0002-2417-6903
Fooyin University · TW

Funding

Fooyin University Hospital FH-HR-112-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to Western populations, Chinese and Asians possess distinct genetics, lifestyles, and dietary habits. They tend to have shorter stature, lower Body Mass Index (BMI), and higher body fat percentages than Western populations. The aim of this study was to compare disparities in maternal-fetal outcomes by combining pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain (GWG) based on distinct US and Chinese guidelines. A total of 2,271 pregnant women who received perinatal care at Fooyin University Hospital from 2016 to 2021 were included. Logistic regression analysis categorized women into twelve groups based on the two criteria to explore the relationships between BMI and GWG, and maternal-fetal outcomes. Among the subjects, only 23.2% and 21.8% women had a normal weight BMI and adequate GWG, based on US and Chinese criteria, respectively. As BMI and GWG increase, the likelihood of developing complications such as gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, Cesarean section, and Large for Gestational Age also rises. Conversely, underweight women with excessive GWG exhibited lower risk of preterm birth either by US or Chinese guidelines. Two criteria exhibited similar odds for investigated outcomes, except for gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Women had more than double the odds of developing gestational hypertension or preeclampsia when using US criteria compared to Chinese criteria. Therefore, it is essential for Asian, especially Chinese women, to be aware of the differences in adverse outcomes such as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia when using US criteria.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGestational Weight GainPregnancy ComplicationsAdultChinaFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesGestational hypertension (GHT), preeclampsia (PE)Gestational weight gain (GWG)Maternal–fetal complicationsPrepregnancy body mass index (BMI)

Identifiers

PMID38594584
OpenAlexW4394601278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.