Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594467›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

In vitro activity of antibiotics potentially effective against difficult-to-treat strains of Gram-negative rods: retrospective study.

Gabriela Kroneislová, Jan Závora, Vanda Gabriela Adámková, Anna Rýdlová, Václava Adámková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriela KroneislováDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostic, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Ke Karlovu 2, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic. gabriela.kroneislova@vfn.cz.
Jan ZávoraDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostic, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Ke Karlovu 2, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.
Vanda Gabriela AdámkováDepartment of Plant Science, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Anna RýdlováDepartment of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Václava AdámkováDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and ATB Centre, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostic, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Ke Karlovu 2, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZImperial College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky MH CZ-DRO-VFN00064165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial resistance surveillance is one of the main outputs of microbiological laboratories and its results are important part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). In this study, the susceptibility of specific bacteria to selected antimicrobial agents was tested. The susceptibility of 90 unique isolates of pathogens of critical priority obtained from clinically valid samples of ICU patients in 2017-2021 was tested. 50% of these fulfilled difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) criteria and 50% were susceptible to all antibiotics included in the definition. 10 Enterobacterales strains met DTR criteria, and 2 (20%) were resistant to colistin (COL), 2 (20%) to cefiderocol (FCR), 7 (70%) to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I/R), 3 (30%) to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAT) and 5 (50%) to fosfomycin (FOS). For Enterobacterales we also tested aztreonam/avibactam (AZA) for which there are no breakpoints yet. The highest MIC of AZA observed was 1 mg/l, MIC range in the susceptible cohort was 0.032-0.064 mg/l and in the DTR cohort (incl. class B beta-lactamase producers) it was 0.064-1 mg/l. Two (13.3%) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR strains) were resistant to COL, 1 (6.7%) to FCR, 13 (86.7%) to I/R, 5 (33.3%) to CAT, and 5 (33.3%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam. All isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with DTR were susceptible to COL and FCR, and at the same time resistant to I/R and ampicillin/sulbactam. New antimicrobial agents are not 100% effective against DTR. Therefore, it is necessary to perform susceptibility testing of these antibiotics, use the data for surveillance (including local surveillance) and conform to AMS standards.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCephalosporinsAztreonamCefiderocolColistinGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo CompoundsAztreonamCefiderocolCephalosporinsColistinAntimicrobial stewardshipAztreonam/avibactamCefiderocolCeftazidime/avibactamCeftolozane/tazobactamColistinDifficult-to-treat resistanceFosfomycinImipenem/cilastatin/relebactam

Identifiers

PMID38594467
PMCPMC11004177
OpenAlexW4394605635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.