ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Development and validation of a deep learning-based microsatellite instability predictor from prostate cancer whole-slide images.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Artificial intelligence for detection, grading, and prognostication in prostate cancer pathology: A scoping review.Histology and histopathology · 2026Article
- GCUNet: a graph neural network-based contextual learning network for tertiary lymphoid structure semantic segmentation in whole slide image.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Article
- Predictive performance precision analysis in medicine: identification of low-confidence predictions at patient and profile levels (MED3pa I).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- The role of AI in oncology: present applications and future horizons.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- CT-based multiple instance and ensemble learning for lymph node metastasis prediction in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre, retrospective study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Validation of histopathology-based deep learning algorithms for detection of actionable non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Deficient Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability in Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Digital pathology-based artificial intelligence model to predict microsatellite instability in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is a tumor-agnostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, MSI status is not routinely tested in prostate cancer, in part due to low prevalence and assay cost. As such, prediction of MSI status from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole-slide images (WSIs) could identify prostate cancer patients most likely to benefit from confirmatory testing to evaluate their eligibility for immunotherapy and need for Lynch syndrome testing. Prostate biopsies and surgical resections from prostate cancer patients referred to our institution were analyzed. MSI status was determined by next-generation sequencing. Patients sequenced before a cutoff date formed an algorithm development set (n = 4015, MSI-H 1.8%) and a paired validation set (n = 173, MSI-H 19.7%) that consisted of two serial sections from each sample, one stained and scanned internally and the other at an external site. Patients sequenced after the cutoff date formed a temporally independent validation set (n = 1350, MSI-H 2.3%). Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict MSI-H from H&E WSIs. The predictor achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.78 (95% CI [0.69-0.86]), 0.72 (95% CI [0.63-0.81]), and 0.72 (95% CI [0.62-0.82]) on the internally prepared, externally prepared, and temporal validation sets, respectively, showing effective predictability and generalization to both external staining/scanning processes and temporally independent samples. While MSI-H status is significantly correlated with Gleason score, the model remained predictive within each Gleason score subgroup.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.