Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38594313›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients with machine learning models.

Meiqi Yu, Shen Wang, Kai He, Fei Teng, Jin Deng, Shuhang Guo, Xiaofeng Yin, Qingguo Lu, Wanjun Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meiqi Yu *School of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China.
Shen Wang *Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Kai HeSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China.
Fei TengTrauma Center, Pizhou People's Hospital, Xuzhou, 221300, Jiangsu, China.
Jin DengDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Shuhang GuoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xiaofeng YinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. xiaofengyin@bjmu.edu.cn.
Qingguo LuTrauma Center, Pizhou People's Hospital, Xuzhou, 221300, Jiangsu, China. 15380118376@163.com.
Wanjun GuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China. wanjungu@njucm.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients using clinical features, including physician diagnoses and physiological data. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort comprising 756 polytrauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Pizhou People's Hospital Trauma Center, Jiangsu, China between 2020 and 2022. Clinical parameters encompassed demographics, vital signs, laboratory values, clinical scores and physician diagnoses. The two primary outcomes considered were mortality and complexity. We developed ML models to predict polytrauma mortality or complexity using four ML algorithms, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). We assessed the models' performance and compared the optimal ML model against three existing trauma evaluation scores, including Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Index (TI) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In addition, we identified several important clinical predictors that made contributions to the prognostic models. The XGBoost-based polytrauma mortality prediction model demonstrated a predictive ability with an accuracy of 90% and an F-score of 88%, outperforming SVM, RF and ANN models. In comparison to conventional scoring systems, the XGBoost model had substantial improvements in predicting the mortality of polytrauma patients. External validation yielded strong stability and generalization with an accuracy of up to 91% and an AUC of 82%. To predict polytrauma complexity, the XGBoost model maintained its performance over other models and scoring systems with good calibration and discrimination abilities. Feature importance analysis highlighted several clinical predictors of polytrauma complexity and mortality, such as Intracranial hematoma (ICH). Leveraging ML algorithms in polytrauma care can enhance the prognostic estimation of polytrauma patients. This approach may have potential value in the management of polytrauma patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMultiple TraumaCalibrationHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesMachine learning modelsPolytrauma complexityPolytrauma mortality

Identifiers

PMID38594313
PMCPMC11004111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.